• About
    • About Us
    • What We Cover
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Our Advertisers
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Send News
  • Subscribe

Oak Ridge Today

  • Home
  • Sign in
  • News
    • Business
    • Community
    • Education
    • Government
    • Health
    • Police and Fire
    • U.S. Department of Energy
    • Weather
  • Sports
    • High School
    • Middle School
    • Recreation
    • Rowing
    • Youth
  • Entertainment
    • Arts
    • Dancing
    • Movies
    • Music
    • Television
    • Theater
  • Premium Content
  • Obituaries
  • Classifieds

 

City approves water contract extension for Y-12, ORNL, but DOE rates questioned

Posted at 8:03 pm March 29, 2016
By John Huotari 5 Comments

Oak-Ridge-Water-Treatment-Plant-2009-1

The Oak Ridge Water Treatment Plant is pictured on Pine Ridge above the Y-12 National Security Complex. (Photo by City of Oak Ridge)

 

Note: This story was last updated at 9 a.m. March 30.

The Oak Ridge City Council on Tuesday approved a one-year, $2.1 million contract extension for water supplied to Oak Ridge National Laboratory and Y-12 National Security Complex, but a few members questioned whether the U.S. Department of Energy is paying a fair rate.

The one-year extension is expected to give the city time to have a qualified third-party engineering firm study the city’s aging water plant on Pine Ridge above Y-12, consider what is needed, and develop options that could help Oak Ridge decide whether to renovate the 70-year-old facility—or build a new one at a new site.

City officials said bringing the existing plant up to code could cost $16 million or more. It was transferred to the city from DOE in 2000, more than 15 years ago. Officials declined to estimate how much it could cost to build a new one, although it’s also said to be in the multi-million-dollar range.

Among the challenges at the water plant now are a leak of 3,000 gallons per day. The city staff is not sure where the leak originates or whether the water that is leaking has already been treated, and so far they haven’t been able to stop the leak.

There is also some slope instability at the ridge top site that could affect access and erosion. That doesn’t make the plant unusable, but it could add to the cost of renovations, said Shira McWaters, the new Oak Ridge Public Works director.

Advertisement

In the meantime, city officials said the water plant, which is capable of 28 million gallons per day but operates in the range of 15-16 million gallons per day, has been modernized and updated, including in its control systems. They said the plant provides excellent water that meets water quality standards and exceeds standards. But they said some of the plant’s current problems could affect its long-term viability.

The $2.1 million fixed-rate water contract extension approved in a 4-2 vote during a special meeting on Tuesday is for up to 1,619,000,000 gallons of water at ORNL and Y-12 through March 31, 2017.

Two City Council members, Charlie Hensley and Trina Baughn, said DOE is taking advantage of the city.

Residents’ rates have more than doubled, while DOE is getting a rate cut, Baughn said.

“This is a fine example of how DOE takes advantage of our customers,” Baughn said. “Here we are ready to give them another break.”

Oak Ridge City Manager Mark Watson disagreed. City officials said DOE consumption has gone down, while city consumption has increased, largely because of water use at the East Tennessee Technology Park, the former K-25 site, after it came online in October 2014.

“DOE’s rate is going down because their consumption is going down,” Oak Ridge Finance Director Janice McGinnis said.

Hensley, who has been critical of the payments in lieu of taxes that DOE pays on its large tracts of land in Oak Ridge, said Oak Ridge residents are subsidizing the federal operation.

“This is another example of DOE taking advantage of the City of Oak Ridge,” he said during the water rate discussion Tuesday. “It’s an ongoing issue that’s existed for 50 years. I would like to see us push back on DOE every time.”

One of the issues raised was the rate paid per 1,000 gallons of water. City officials said DOE is paying about $1.68 per 1,000 gallons of water.

But Baughn said she calculated, based on her last residential bill, that she is paying $7.16 per 1,000 gallons of water, or more than four times as much as the DOE rate. How does she explain that to residents? Baughn asked.

Advertisement

Other Council members used numbers that estimated the city’s cost per 1,000 gallons somewhere between $4 and $6, although city staff members said they weren’t sure where those numbers came from.

Council member Chuck Hope said the contract goes down $177,000 from this year to next. (The annual rate drops from about $2.281 million this year to $2.103 million in the year starting April 1.) Hope said DOE ought to pay a higher fee per 1,000 gallons for water.

“If it costs $6 per 1,000 gallons, they should at least pay that,” Hope said.

Oak Ridge officials said a residential system is different than a large consumer system like DOE’s water system at ORNL and Y-12. There is a higher cost per unit in a residential system than in a large consumer system, Watson said. The large consumer system has large pipes moving water, while the residential system has small pipes with electricity-consuming pumps that move water up and down the hills of the city, Watson said.

Oak Ridge Finance Director Janice McGinnis said DOE doesn’t pay the costs of distribution, which includes pushing water through 225 miles of water lines in the city with the help of pumps. With many low-consuming households, there isn’t enough base to distribute the costs in the residential system, she said.

Still, the question of whether $1.68 per 1,000 gallons is a fair rate is a question that should be considered, Watson said. He said he understands some of the frustration.

Congressman Chuck Fleischmann, among others, has toured the water plant, Watson said. You don’t run modern nuclear facilities on the equivalent of a Model T engine, he said. Some money will have to be spent, although it’s not clear yet who will spend it, Watson said.

“In my personal opinion, it’s a DOE facility, and they should pay for the whole thing,” Hensley responded.

City officials said DOE is cutting water consumption. Some of the reductions cited by officials, including Jack Suggs, who served as interim Public Works director, include the lifting of a requirement that Y-12 pump water into East Fork Poplar Creek to help sustain the fish population. The lifting of that requirement by the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation ended a small profit for the city, officials said.

Advertisement

Some Council members and a few city staff members suggested that the contract extension approved Tuesday was the best option that the city had at this point. Not approving the fixed-rate contract, and billing DOE a monthly retail rate for water use at ORNL and Y-12, could result in DOE paying what it thinks it owes, rather than what the city thinks it owes, officials said. The dispute could end up in a costly court challenge—with less than $2.1 million paid to the city in the meantime, they said.

And turning the water plant back over to DOE would make the city the rate payer, and it would mean DOE would set water rates.

“None of us are happy,” Oak Ridge Mayor Warren Gooch said. But, he added, referring to the $2.1 million one-year fixed rate, “this amount is guaranteed.”

That sentiment was echoed to some extent by Council member Kelly Callison. He said the city will get paid $175,000 per month under the contract extension. Or, alternatively, Oak Ridge could “play chicken” with the federal government and end up in court, Callison said. But the city needs a “real world” settlement with DOE by the end of the year, he said.

Voting for the contract extension were Gooch, Hensley, Callison, and Council member Rick Chinn. Voting against it were Baughn and Hope. Mayor Pro Tem Ellen Smith was absent.

Chinn said he wouldn’t disagree with many of the statements at Tuesday’s meeting, but he didn’t think it was the place to negotiate. The negotiations should be behind closed doors with the negotiating parties, Chinn said, not by Council members “throwing darts” when the press is recording what they are saying.

Baughn disagreed, saying the discussion is the business of the public, and there are too many negotiations behind closed doors.

Watson said the city and DOE started negotiating in October and have had numerous meetings since then. The report from the consulting engineering firm is expected within the next six months. In the meantime, the $2.1 million contract extension will provide operations and maintenance funding for the period between April 1, 2016, and March 31, 2017, Watson said.

Also in the meantime, the city plans to work on “uncrossing” raw water lines that run behind the New Hope Center at Y-12 and eliminate a chlorine gas tank system at the water plant in favor of an additive system, apparently to reduce risk. The first project will be done at city expense, and the second will be done at DOE expense.

Oak Ridge has proposed that DOE fund $125,000 of a $250,000 line item for small maintenance expenses and routine maintenance.

Although ORNL and Y-12 are included in the contract extension, ETTP and the DOE Oak Ridge Office, located at the Joe L. Evins Federal Building in central Oak Ridge, are not. They are both on a retail rate.

Regarding percentages of consumption, McGinnis said DOE consumed 1.55 billion gallons of water in Calendar Year 2014 at ORNL and Y-12, or about 52.7 percent of water consumption. That dropped to 1.35 billion gallons of water, or roughly 47.5 percent of consumption, in CY 2015.

Meanwhile, city consumption increased from 1.39 billion gallons (47.34 percent) in CY 2014 to 1.49 billion gallons (52.51 percent) in CY 2015.

City officials said there are 6 percent water and sewer rate increases expected this year, although they haven’t been considered by the City Council yet.

You can find links to the special meeting agenda and additional information here.

More information will be added as it becomes available.

Copyright 2016 Oak Ridge Today. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Filed Under: Front Page News, Government, Oak Ridge, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Top Stories, U.S. Department of Energy, Y-12 National Security Complex Tagged With: Charlie Hensley, Chuck Hope, contract extension, DOE Oak Ridge Office, East Tennessee Technology Park, Ellen Smith, Jack Suggs, Janice McGinnis, K-25, Kelly Callison, Mark Watson, Oak Ridge, Oak Ridge City Council, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge Public Works, Oak Ridge Water Treatment Plant, ORNL, Rick Chinn, Shira McWaters, Trina Baughn, U.S. Department of Energy, Warren Gooch, water, water contract, water contract extension, water rate, Y-12 National Security Complex

Advertisements

 


Join the club!

If you appreciate our work, please consider subscribing. Besides helping us, your subscription will give you access to our premium content.

Some of our stories are free, brought to you by Oak Ridge Today with help from our members—advertisers, subscribers, and sponsors.

But some are premium content, available only to members. Those are in-depth, investigative, or exclusive stories that are available only on Oak Ridge Today. They generally require significant time to report, write, and publish.

You can subscribe for as little as $5 per month.

You can read more about your options here.

We currently offer five primary subscription options to readers, and they include benefits.

Basic

  • Basic monthly subscription ($5 per month)—access premium content
  • Basic annual subscription ($60 per year)—access premium content

Pro

  • Pro monthly subscription ($10 per month)—access premium content, get breaking news emails first, and submit one press release or public service announcement per month
  • Pro annual subscription ($100 per year)—save $20 per year, access premium content, get breaking news emails first, and submit one press release or public service announcement per month

Temporary

  • Temporary access ($3 per week for two weeks)

We also have advanced subscription options. You can see them here.

We also accept donations. You can donate here.

If you prefer to send a check for a subscription or donation, you may do so by mailing one to:

Oak Ridge Today
P.O. Box 6064
Oak Ridge, TN 37831

Thank you for your consideration and for reading Oak Ridge Today. We appreciate your support.

Commenting Guidelines

We welcome comments, but we ask you to follow a few guidelines:

1) Please use your real name, including last name. Please also use a valid e-mail address.
2) Be civil. Don't insult others, attack their character, or get personal.
3) Stick to the issues.
4) No profanity.
5) Keep your comments to a reasonable length and to a reasonable number per article.

We reserve the right to remove any comments that violate these guidelines. Comments held for review, usually from those posting for the first time, may not post if they violate these guidelines. Thank you for your patience and understanding. Thank you also for reading Oak Ridge Today and for participating in the discussion.

More information is available here.

Comments

  1. Joseph Lee says

    March 30, 2016 at 8:24 am

    The council meeting yesterday evening was very interesting. If we as a city are going to pick a fight with DOE, we should have a plan and an definition of what winning looks like before it gets under way. Good call by council last nigh. This isn’t over. Prior planning prevents poor performance.

    Reply
  2. WK Hyatt says

    March 30, 2016 at 5:33 pm

    This and the PILT set at 1960 rates based on 1942 land assessments are allowing DOE to get off cheap. Back in the 60s, 70s and 80s, that was OK because Oak Ridge was prosperous and had a lot of DOE workers living here and three plants operating and high employment until it began to decline in 1984 and then the fall of K-25 in 1985. Now, most DOE employees live in Knoxville and new employees are also steered toward Knoxville as well, so DOE has less and less interest in OR and the private sector, which it was hoped would replace DOE, simply hasn’t shown up. The only hope OR has to survive is to get a pretty significant increase in the PILT and a lot better deal than this water contract, which shifts the burden on to the residents and business water/sewer customers with another 6% rate increase coming up. Heck, I wish I could do what DOE would do, pay what I think I owe. I commend Council members Hope and Baughn for voting against it.

    Reply
    • Joseph Lee says

      March 31, 2016 at 2:37 pm

      Mr. Hyatt, thank you for the good points you have noted above. I’m sure you also understand that if there had been four NO votes on this issue then that would have taken $2.1 million in revenue off the city’s books. Every one of those pennies count too. We were not ready to go there. We’ll get ready. This ain’t over.

      Reply
      • Sam Hopwood says

        March 31, 2016 at 3:04 pm

        It’s over Joe. The majority of council will cave in again in a year. It’s what they do. Now let’s get that next payment in on the golf course. Every payment counts.

        Reply
        • Joseph Lee says

          March 31, 2016 at 10:01 pm

          I’ve missed you Sam. Where have you been? Hope you are doing well.

          Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More Government News

Eby elected chair of state school board

Bob Eby, a former chair and vice chair of the Oak Ridge school board, has been elected chair of the Tennessee State Board of Education. He will serve a two-year term. Eby was appointed to the state school board by … [Read More...]

McNally has pacemaker surgery

Tennessee Lieutenant Governor Randy McNally reported on Friday that he had pacemaker surgery and it went smoothly. McNally had said on his official Facebook page that, before the surgery, he had experienced the … [Read More...]

Company could evaluate leaving rail in place at airport

The Brentwood company performing preliminary studies for the proposed Oak Ridge Airport could evaluate leaving a short section of railroad in place and building a runway bridge over it. The short section of railroad … [Read More...]

Residents discuss Dollar General in Marlow

A handful of Anderson County residents have expressed mixed opinions in government meetings about a reported proposal to build a Dollar General store next to Oliver Springs Highway in Marlow, but the Anderson County … [Read More...]

Read city manager’s retirement letter

This is a copy of the January 17 retirement letter from Oak Ridge City Manager Mark Watson to the seven Oak Ridge City Council members. Since August of 2010, I have been proud to serve the City of Oak Ridge as its … [Read More...]

More Government

More U.S. Department of Energy News

Eight new members join DOE’s environmental advisory board

The U.S. Department of Energy recently welcomed eight new members to its Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management citizen advisory board. The Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board is a federally chartered … [Read More...]

DOE conducting controlled burns on Oak Ridge Reservation

The U.S. Department of Energy is conducting controlled burns of grassland areas on the Oak Ridge Reservation through mid-April, weather permitting. People may see smoke from this activity. However, smoke in Oak Ridge … [Read More...]

UCOR announces management change

United Cleanup Oak Ridge LLC, the lead cleanup contractor at federal sites in Oak Ridge, has announced a top management change that will be effective April 1. UCOR Chief Operating Officer Tom Dieter has announced he … [Read More...]

Y-12 honored with DOE sustainability partnership award

The Y-12 National Security Complex recently received a U.S. Department of Energy Sustainability Award for Strategic Partnerships for Sustainability. The Y-12 team was recognized for its efforts to improve efficiency, … [Read More...]

UPF construction could cost more, take longer

The Uranium Processing Facility at Y-12 National Security Complex was supposed to be completed by 2025 for no more than $6.5 billion, but that might no longer be the case. In the past week, federal officials said … [Read More...]

More DOE

Recent Posts

  • Ken Tarcza, Ph.D., joins ORAU as chief of staff
  • Community Band to perform ‘Music for Spring’
  • Eight new members join DOE’s environmental advisory board
  • DOE conducting controlled burns on Oak Ridge Reservation
  • Schools publish number of open seats per school
  • History Museum to celebrate new Hutment Exhibit
  • Community Egg Hunt is Saturday, April 1
  • Austin Knight Foundation donates $5,000 to Roane State’s EMS program
  • Roane State to host Virtual FAFSA Workshop on March 24
  • Today: International Festival at Children’s Museum

Search Oak Ridge Today

About Us

About Oak Ridge Today
What We Cover

How To

Advertise
Subscribe

Contact Us

Contact Oak Ridge Today

Copyright © 2023 Oak Ridge Today