The Oak Ridge City Council on Tuesday rejected a request to use red light camera money to reimburse the school system $36,000 for sinkhole repairs made in April at the Oak Ridge High School soccer field.
Council also agreed to transfer a small burned-out lot on Hillside Road to Habitat for Humanity of Anderson County and rejected a proposal to lower the property tax rate by one cent.
Asked about the sinkhole repair reimbursement on Tuesday, Oak Ridge Schools Interim Superintendent Bob Smallridge said the school system, which expects revenues to fall by about $1 million and is cutting 18 positions, has a tight budget.
But the city also has a tight budget, Oak Ridge City Council member Anne Garcia Garland retorted.
Several Council members objected to the reimbursement request, questioning the emergency nature of the repairs, expressing concern about the use of the red light camera money, and alleging the school system hasn’t previously spent all the capital maintenance money it has received from the city.
Smallridge said the soccer field contains geothermal wells, which help to heat and cool the high school, and that made the sinkhole repairs more complicated and more expensive than they would have been otherwise.
Oak Ridge Mayor Pro Tem Jane Miller said if the Council agreed to reimburse the school system this time, the school board could come back “again and again.â€
School officials acknowledged that that was the case. They said their capital maintenance funding from the city has been cut from $750,000 to $250,000, and they had been instructed to seek funding from the city for emergency repairs.
Oak Ridge City Manager Mark Watson had recommended using the red light camera money for the sinkhole repairs since the 13-foot hole affected student safety. The red light camera money has been designated for pedestrian and bicycle safety improvements.
Voting for the repair reimbursement were Oak Ridge City Council members Charlie Hensley, Chuck Hope, and David Mosby.
Voting against it were Miller, Oak Ridge Mayor Tom Beehan, and City Council members Trina Baughn and Anne Garcia Garland.
A home on the lot transferred to Habitat for Humanity of Anderson County was destroyed in a February fire. The city purchased the property at 148 Hillside Road for about $11,000, and Habitat hopes to build a new home there for a single mother with four children by September, or the nonprofit organization could lose a grant.
Municipal officials said the project would eliminate blight, save city money on demolition and cleanup work, and add a new home to the property tax rolls.
Council members who questioned the transfer to HFHAC said the city has plenty of property and is giving away land, and they said Oak Ridge lacks a good policy governing land acquisitions and donations, including to determine who will choose the properties and how much the city will spend.
Oak Ridge City Council member Charlie Hensley called some of the debate ridiculous.
“We have an opportunity for a private-public partnership with a very reputable organization,†Hensley said. The city has two choices: leave a burned-out home, or have a new one by September, he said.
“It improves the whole neighborhood,†Hensley said.
Still, Oak Ridge City Council member Chuck Hope said he wanted more information on the specific costs of the Hillside Road project and the amount of time it would take to recoup the city’s investment.
Jennifer Sheehan, interim executive director of Habitat for Humanity of Anderson County, said the home has to be built on donated land under grant requirements through the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati. She estimated the city could recoup its investment in about 15 years.
Oak Ridge acquired the property through the Housing and Urban Development Economic Development Initiative.
Voting for the property transfer to Habitat were Beehan, Hensley, Hope, and Miller.
Voting against it were Baughn and Garcia Garland.
Oak Ridge City Council member David Mosby abstained.
As previously reported, the City Council approved a budget on second and final reading on Tuesday that does not raise raise the property tax rate in the fiscal year that starts July 1. It provides $50,000 more for the Oak Ridge Chamber of Commerce than Oak Ridge City Manager Mark Watson had requested, and it gives city employees a 1 percent pay raise.
Council members rejected a proposal from Baughn to reduce the property tax rate by one penny to $2.38 per $100 of assessed value, which would have cut city revenues by about $90,000.
“At this time, I don’t think I can support a tax reduction,†Miller said.
Voting in favor of the cut were Baughn and Hope. Voting against it were Beehan, Hensley, Miller, and Mosby.
Garcia Garland abstained.
The vote for the budget itself was 6-1. Baughn cast the lone “no†vote.
Mike Mahathy says
So the council can spend hard-earned taxpayer funds to buy property from a private citizen, pay for clean-up and donate it but they refuse to repair city property under their control.
Sam Hopwood says
The BOE is reaping what they have sown Mike, by deliberately creating a confrontational climate with Council. Their “we don’t answer to anyone” attitude isn’t going to fly anymore. They need to do the right thing and cough up the purloined high school mortgage payment but a little thing called arrogance is standing in the way…… Just my view
Denny Phillips says
I have heard that the BOE has gone to Nashville and requested a private act that would require 100% of sales tax revenues to be earmarked for the schools. Do you know anything about this?
Mike Mahathy says
The session is over.
Denny Phillips says
I am aware of that and honestly this is a question. Just trying to differentiate fact from water cooler talk and this blog is generally a fertile source of info.
Sam Hopwood says
I have no knowledge of that but nothing the BOE does anymore surprises me. Very sad but the leadership is harming our very good school system……. Just my view.
Tracy says
Its sad that after all the money Pro2serve and the boys & girls boosters club put into that field that its sitting there in that condition. The BOE not paying their mortgage is an issue of accountablitliy and should have been addressed by someone a LONG time ago. The sinkhole was an act of nature that is out of human control. Its an inconvenience to the teams that can’t practice or play there and have to move to Katie Hunter with crumby bleachers & porta potties. To penalize the kids for the governments bad decisions is wrong. Why was it a yes or no decision? How about we will pay half if you pay half?
TJ says
Who is “we”? And Tracy who?
TJ says
Got me. I assumed it would print my last name also-Garland
Sam Hopwood says
Not to worry, the sinkhole was repaired and the school’s budget will pay for it as it should. The money is there. The BOE is simply crying “wolf’ again. City Council is not being fooled. Simple as that.
Tracy says
I was speaking of the city and the school sharing the cost.