• About
    • About Us
    • What We Cover
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Our Advertisers
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Send News
  • Subscribe

Oak Ridge Today

  • Home
  • Sign in
  • News
    • Business
    • Community
    • Education
    • Government
    • Health
    • Police and Fire
    • U.S. Department of Energy
    • Weather
  • Sports
    • High School
    • Middle School
    • Recreation
    • Rowing
    • Youth
  • Entertainment
    • Arts
    • Dancing
    • Movies
    • Music
    • Television
    • Theater
  • Premium Content
  • Obituaries
  • Classifieds

 

Y-12 evaluation: Some excellent ratings, but unsatisfactory on security, UPF

Posted at 12:15 pm February 12, 2013
By John Huotari Leave a Comment

Y-12 National Security Complex

Y-12 National Security Complex (Submitted photo)

Although it received excellent and very good ratings in some areas, the contractor that manages and operates the Y-12 National Security Complex in Oak Ridge was stung by unsatisfactory marks for its performance before and during the July 28 security breach and the redesign of the new Uranium Processing Facility.

The National Nuclear Security Administration said the UPF redesign could add $539 million to the project cost and extend its schedule by 13 months. The UPF has been estimated to cost up to $6.5 billion, and plans have called for it to start operating as early as 2023.

The NNSA also said the Y-12 security system and protective force completely failed when three anti-nuclear weapons activists penetrated a high-security Protected Area before dawn on July 28. The three protesters were able to avoid detection and cut through three fences inside Y-12 before spraying paint and splashing human blood on the Highly Enriched Uranium Materials Facility, where bomb-grade uranium is stored.

But federal officials awarded “excellent” or “very good” ratings to the contractor, Babcock and Wilcox Y-12 Technical Services LLC, or B&W Y-12, for operations in areas that include environmental and waste management activities, infrastructure improvements, risk reduction initiatives, cyber security, and stockpile and nuclear nonproliferation work.

On Monday, the NNSA released a 27-page report evaluating B&W Y-12‘s performance in the fiscal year that ended Sept. 30. The NNSA also released performance evaluation reports for six other sites.

Federal officials had earlier released a summary of B&W Y-12’s performance that said the contractor earned a “very good” rating in program activities, a “satisfactory” rating in operations, and a “very good” rating in institutional management and business.

In the full report released Monday, the NNSA called the unprecedented security breach a “major failure.” It awarded “unsatisfactory” ratings for physical security, and safeguards and security program management.

“This rating is based on the complete failure of the security system/protective force response to the Perimeter Intrusion Detection and Assessment System penetration on July 28 and the completely unacceptable implementation and operation of the Argus security system,” the report said. “As implemented, Argus unreliability significantly contributed to the PIDAS penetration event of July 28.”

The evaluation found unacceptable performance in all areas required for successful operations, such as training and qualification, readiness and response, procedures and processes, maintenance, testing, and situational awareness.

The NNSA said B&W Y-12’s response to the security breach was also unsatisfactory.

“Significant federal leadership was required in the absence of contractor leadership and support that was ‘slow, disoriented, and requiring intervention by NNSA Production Office,’” the report said.

In the summary released last month, the NNSA said B&W Y-12 lost a total of $12.1 million in award fees due to the July 28 security breach. That included 100 percent of their possible security-related fee, and a “negative overall management fee adjustment of $10 million.” The contractor earned 58.9 percent of its possible incentive fee, or a total of roughly $35.9 million.

Federal officials said B&W Y-12 has reorganized security and emergency services since the highly publicized breach, established new leadership, started managing the security guard Protective Force, and in general, “reinvigorated the security program with a sense of urgency and focus.”

Important detectors and sensing equipment have been replaced, adequate spare parts are on hand, maintenance times for critical security systems have been reduced, performance testing has been enhanced, and the rates of false and nuisance alarms have been significantly reduced, the report said.

“Because of excellent leadership, B&W has moved the program forward leaps and bounds beyond where it was on July 28,” the report said. However, the contractor has more work to do, federal officials said.

The report also gave B&W Y-12 an “unsatisfactory” rating for its management of the UPF project.

“This rating is based on the facility size (fit) issue that will increase project cost, extend the project schedule, and result in reduced project scope,” the report said.

The UPF design team notified the NNSA that the building would have to be redesigned—it will have to be enlarged—after the design was more than 75 percent complete because the team determined that the equipment and utilities “could not physically fit in the facility and maintain adequate operations and maintenance spaces—nor was there sufficient space margin to allow for design evolution and field changes,” the report said.

Among other things, the report said the UPF project has not been able to meet key milestones, and the management team has been late in identifying that schedule milestones would not be achieved.

The full report rated B&W Y-12 as “very good” in directed stockpile work, campaigns, and plant-directed research and development, and nuclear nonproliferation, naval reactors, and complementary work for others.

Filed Under: National Nuclear Security Administration, Special Sections, Top Stories, Y-12 National Security Complex, Y-12 Security Breach Tagged With: anti-nuclear weapons activists, award fees, B&W Y-12, Babcock and Wilcox Y-12 Technical Services LLC, cyber security, environmental, Highly Enriched Uranium Materials Facility, infrastructure, National Nuclear Security Administration, NNSA, nuclear nonproliferation, performance evaluation report, protective force, protesters, ratings, risk reduction, security breach, security system, stockpile, UPF, UPF redesign, uranium processing facility, Waste Management, Y-12, Y-12 evaluation, Y-12 National Security Complex

Advertisements

 


Join the club!

If you appreciate our work, please consider subscribing. Besides helping us, your subscription will give you access to our premium content.

Some of our stories are free, brought to you by Oak Ridge Today with help from our members—advertisers, subscribers, and sponsors.

But some are premium content, available only to members. Those are in-depth, investigative, or exclusive stories that are available only on Oak Ridge Today. They generally require significant time to report, write, and publish.

You can subscribe for as little as $5 per month.

You can read more about your options here.

We currently offer five primary subscription options to readers, and they include benefits.

Basic

  • Basic monthly subscription ($5 per month)—access premium content
  • Basic annual subscription ($60 per year)—access premium content

Pro

  • Pro monthly subscription ($10 per month)—access premium content, get breaking news emails first, and submit one press release or public service announcement per month
  • Pro annual subscription ($100 per year)—save $20 per year, access premium content, get breaking news emails first, and submit one press release or public service announcement per month

Temporary

  • Temporary access ($3 per week for two weeks)

We also have advanced subscription options. You can see them here.

We also accept donations. You can donate here.

If you prefer to send a check for a subscription or donation, you may do so by mailing one to:

Oak Ridge Today
P.O. Box 6064
Oak Ridge, TN 37831

Thank you for your consideration and for reading Oak Ridge Today. We appreciate your support.

Commenting Guidelines

We welcome comments, but we ask you to follow a few guidelines:

1) Please use your real name, including last name. Please also use a valid e-mail address.
2) Be civil. Don't insult others, attack their character, or get personal.
3) Stick to the issues.
4) No profanity.
5) Keep your comments to a reasonable length and to a reasonable number per article.

We reserve the right to remove any comments that violate these guidelines. Comments held for review, usually from those posting for the first time, may not post if they violate these guidelines. Thank you for your patience and understanding. Thank you also for reading Oak Ridge Today and for participating in the discussion.

More information is available here.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Basketball: Wildcats beat West in rematch
  • Basketball: Lady Wildcats undefeated in district
  • Obituaries: Jan. 23-27, 2023
  • Speakers mostly support TRISO-X fuel facility at meeting
  • UPF construction could cost more, take longer
  • Y-12 celebrates new fire station, emergency operations center
  • One person seriously injured in Wednesday crash
  • Oak Ridge EM prepared for cold weather to prevent failures
  • Covenant Health donating land for Roane State health science center
  • School board approves aviation career path

Search Oak Ridge Today

About Us

About Oak Ridge Today
What We Cover

How To

Advertise
Subscribe

Contact Us

Contact Oak Ridge Today

Copyright © 2023 Oak Ridge Today