• About
    • About Us
    • What We Cover
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Our Advertisers
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Send News
  • Subscribe

Oak Ridge Today

  • Home
  • Sign in
  • News
    • Business
    • Community
    • Education
    • Government
    • Health
    • Police and Fire
    • U.S. Department of Energy
    • Weather
  • Sports
    • High School
    • Middle School
    • Recreation
    • Rowing
    • Youth
  • Entertainment
    • Arts
    • Dancing
    • Movies
    • Music
    • Television
    • Theater
  • Premium Content
  • Obituaries
  • Classifieds

NNSA budget request includes slight spending increase for UPF

Posted at 11:39 am March 6, 2014
By John Huotari Leave a Comment

Uranium Processing Facility

Pictured above is the proposed Uranium Processing Facility at the Y-12 National Security Complex, with the administrative area in the front and the fortified section of the building in the rear. (Submitted image)

The budget request announced this week for the National Nuclear Security Administration includes a slight increase in spending for the proposed multi-billion-dollar Uranium Processing Facility at the Y-12 National Security Complex.

The $335 million request for UPF in Fiscal Year 2015, which starts Oct. 1, is up slightly from $326 million in FY14. That’s roughly a 2.8 percent increase.

The UPF project, which has an official cost estimate of up to $6.5 billion, is part of a broader effort to modernize Y-12, including its production facilities. The 811-acre plant was built during World War II to help enrich uranium for the world’s first atomic weapons.

But questions have been raised about rising cost projections and a redesign of the UPF. In February 2013, the NNSA said the redesign could add $539 million to the project cost and extend its schedule.

During a conference call with reporters on Tuesday, NNSA Acting Administrator Bruce Held said the agency wants to get workers out of Building 9212 at Y-12 by 2025.

“We think it’s prudent to set that line in the sand,” Held said.

Plans had once called for the UPF to start operating as early as 2023.

The project is currently under review by a so-called Red Team that is led by Oak Ridge National Laboratory Director Thom Mason.

On Tuesday, NNSA officials—including Held, Anne Harrington, Don Cook, and Bob Raines—said there were many components of the project that were going to be done this year, regardless of the Red Team review and current budget issues. Those include work on design and technology development, and seismic studies and safety analyses.

Some lessons learned from the project to replace the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Facility at Los Alamos National Laboratory could be applied to the UPF, Held said. That could translate into a “more modular approach” at the UPF project, NNSA officials said.

The NNSA budget request, which also includes a total of $1.16 billion for Y-12, includes a 4 percent increase in overall spending.

“There has been some pain,” Held said, particularly on nuclear nonproliferation work. And the MOX project in South Carolina, a first-of-its-kind nuclear facility, has been put on “full standby” because of cost overruns. Federal officials will study other options ranging from a geologic repository to using canisters to dispose of some 34 metric tons of plutonium.

NNSA officials said they have balanced the needs of their agency—ensuring a safe nuclear deterrent, working on nuclear nonproliferation, and supplying nuclear fuel for the navy—against federal budget constraints.

The budget request still has to be considered by Congress.

Filed Under: National Nuclear Security Administration, Top Stories, Y-12 National Security Complex Tagged With: Anne Harrington, Bob Raines, Bruce Held, budget request, Building 9212, Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Facility, Don Cook, Los Alamos National Laboratory, MOX, National Nuclear Security Administration, NNSA, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Red Team, Thom Mason, UPF, uranium processing facility, Y-12 National Security Complex

Advertisements


 

Join the club!

If you appreciate our work, please consider subscribing. Besides helping us, your subscription will give you access to our premium content.

Most of our stories are free, brought to you by Oak Ridge Today with help from our members—advertisers, subscribers, and sponsors.

But some are premium content, available only to members. Those are in-depth, investigative, or exclusive stories that are available only on Oak Ridge Today. They generally require at least four hours to report, write, and publish.

You can subscribe for as little as $5 per month.

You can read more about your options here.

We currently offer five primary subscription options to readers, and they include benefits.

Basic

  • Basic monthly subscription ($5 per month)—access premium content
  • Basic annual subscription ($60 per year)—access premium content

Pro

  • Pro monthly subscription ($10 per month)—access premium content, get breaking news emails first, and submit one press release or public service announcement per month
  • Pro annual subscription ($100 per year)—save $20 per year, access premium content, get breaking news emails first, and submit one press release or public service announcement per month

Temporary

  • Temporary access ($3 per week for two weeks)

We also have advanced subscription options. You can see them here.

We also accept donations. You can donate here.

If you prefer to send a check for a subscription or donation, you may do so by mailing one to:

Oak Ridge Today
P.O. Box 6064
Oak Ridge, TN 37831

Thank you for your consideration and for reading Oak Ridge Today. We appreciate your support.

Commenting Guidelines

We welcome comments, but we ask you to follow a few guidelines:

1) Please use your real name, including last name. Please also use a valid e-mail address.
2) Be civil. Don't insult others, attack their character, or get personal.
3) Stick to the issues.
4) No profanity.
5) Keep your comments to a reasonable length and to a reasonable number per article.

We reserve the right to remove any comments that violate these guidelines. Comments held for review, usually from those posting for the first time, may not post if they violate these guidelines. Thank you for your patience and understanding. Thank you also for reading Oak Ridge Today and for participating in the discussion.

More information is available here.

Recent Posts

  • ORAU launches new app with a variety of resources available, including hundreds of STEM internships, fellowships and research opportunities
  • Disposing of uranium waste could cost at least $7.2 billion
  • Y-12 now getting power from Pine Ridge substation
  • Man sentenced to 8 years after fleeing, crashing, attempting carjackings
  • Three Ohio residents die in two-vehicle crash
  • DOE picks Idaho for nuclear test reactor
  • TBI investigating man’s death
  • Luminarias to feature peace messages
  • Oak Ridge tennis court dance is Thursday
  • DOE bus tours restart in Oak Ridge

Search Oak Ridge Today

About Us

About Oak Ridge Today
What We Cover

How To

Advertise
Subscribe

Contact Us

Contact Oak Ridge Today

Copyright © 2022 Oak Ridge Today