• About
    • About Us
    • What We Cover
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Our Advertisers
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Send News
  • Subscribe

Oak Ridge Today

  • Home
  • Sign in
  • News
    • Business
    • Community
    • Education
    • Government
    • Health
    • Police and Fire
    • U.S. Department of Energy
    • Weather
  • Sports
    • High School
    • Middle School
    • Recreation
    • Rowing
    • Youth
  • Entertainment
    • Arts
    • Dancing
    • Movies
    • Music
    • Television
    • Theater
  • Premium Content
  • Obituaries
  • Classifieds

 

Mayor, sheriff reach agreement on salary suit, but war of words follows

Posted at 12:00 am December 9, 2013
By John Huotari Leave a Comment

Anderson County Detention Facility Expansion

The salary dispute between the Anderson County mayor and sheriff focused on the spending to hire up to 36 new jailers to staff a 212-bed expansion that is still under construction at the Anderson County Detention Facility in Clinton.

CLINTON—The Anderson County mayor and sheriff reached an agreement Friday that could end their five-month-old legal dispute over an annual salary agreement, possibly closing one expensive and contentious chapter in local government even as it opened a new war of words between top officials.

Knox County Circuit Court Judge Dale C. Workman could sign the agreement Monday morning.

Anderson County Mayor Terry Frank and Sheriff Paul White said the agreement allows the sheriff to hire 15 full-time permanent deputies and additional temporary deputies when the sheriff deems appropriate as he prepares to open a 212-bed jail expansion. But the hiring must stay within the spending limit approved by the Anderson County Commission this year, and the temporary employees cannot work more than six months.

Terry Frank

Terry Frank

Frank and White announced the agreement in a one-page press release distributed Friday. The case had been scheduled to be heard in Knox County Circuit Court on Monday morning.

Firing the first shot, Frank quickly painted the agreement as a victory for her position. She said it contained the same offer she made to the sheriff even before he filed a lawsuit—officially known as a writ of mandamus—in July.

She said the sheriff had been misled into filing suit over the two-page salary agreement.

“Unfortunately, I believe Sheriff White fell prey to the political machinations of Commissioner Myron Iwanski and Law Director Jay Yeager to create dissension in what could have been an easily manageable agreement,” Frank said. “Commissioner Iwanski led people to believe we could budget for half-years for annual salaries, and Mr. Yeager continued the myth. Fortunately for the taxpayers of Anderson County, their efforts have failed.”

Anderson County Law Director Jay Yeager and Commissioner Rick Meredith

Anderson County Law Director Jay Yeager, right, talks to Anderson County Commission, including Commissioner Rick Meredith, during a special meeting in November.

Yeager soon fired back, saying Frank’s statements about him were false and have “no factual merit.”

“Obviously, the sheriff has prevailed in this disagreement, and the mayor is trying to put her political spin on this just outcome and unfortunately blame others for her lack of leadership ability,” Yeager said. “Despite past misstatements, the sheriff was never asking for additional monetary appropriations in his budget. He was always satisfied with the amount appropriated by County Commission in June and promised he could operate effectively and open the new jail expansion within that budget. The agreement reached today between the two parties is reflective of his satisfaction with the Commission’s budget.

“Unfortunately, due to the mayor’s desire to engage in protracted litigation, Anderson County citizens have to shoulder the financial burden of this unnecessary consequence.”

Myron Iwanski

Myron Iwanski

Iwanski also responded. He said the agreement allows the sheriff to hire the staff—up to 36 new jailers—needed to open the new jail. That’s what County Commission approved in the budget six months ago and what County Commission had asked the mayor to work out several times since July, Iwanski said.

“It’s unfortunate that in the mayor’s press release she continues to use character assassinations and misinformation as a way to justify this long and costly legal battle,” Iwanski said. “It’s baffling that something as simple as changing a few words in the salary agreement could not have been worked out much sooner and without going to court. This would have avoided all the legal costs and the hundreds of hours of staff time involved in this legal battle.”

The sheriff maintained his silence through the weekend, but he is expected to release a statement on Monday after Workman signs the order. (Update: The sheriff released a statement Monday afternoon.)

The dispute started this summer when Frank refused to sign the annual salary agreement proposed by the Anderson County Sheriff’s Department. She said it included about $7.7 million for salaries, roughly $1 million more than the $6.6 million that commission approved in June.

If she did sign the agreement, Frank said, the county commission would be committed to the new salary level under state maintenance-of-effort requirements, and that could lead to an eight-cent property tax rate increase in 2014.

Anderson County Commission and Mark Lucas

Anderson County Sheriff’s Department Chief Deputy Mark Lucas talks about the sheriff’s proposed salary agreement, the subject of a legal dispute, during a special County Commission meeting in November.

But Anderson County Sheriff’s Department Chief Deputy Mark Lucas said the salary agreement required a calculation that assumed the department would be fully staffed with 218 employees at full salaries for a full year. And that wasn’t expected to happen for several reasons, Lucas said. Among them: 36 of the 218 workers would only be needed for a half-year to open the new jail pod after Jan. 1.

“We will never get to that,” Lucas said of the $7 million salary level.

He said the letters of agreement have been used for “many, many years” in a form suggested by the state comptroller, and the Sheriff’s Department has never spent the maximum amount included in the agreement because of employee turnover and probationary periods.

Commission was unable to resolve the dispute in July, and White filed suit.

By August, commissioners were already expressing concern over the legal fees, which by then were estimated to exceed $20,000.

“I don’t understand why this is going to court,” Iwanski said then. “I think it’s unfortunate that we’re hiring a lawyer to sue ourselves, basically. I think we need to stop the craziness.”

But efforts to “stop the bleeding” were unsuccessful.

Anderson County Detention Facility Construction

At right, the main entrance to the Anderson County Detention Facility in Clinton is being remodeled as part of a roughly $10 million jail expansion project. A new 212-bed jail pod is under construction in the background at left.

A few days later, though, Frank and White announced they had reached an interim agreement that would allow the sheriff to hire another 15 deputies for an expanded jail and hire a coordinator for the Alternatives to Incarceration program. That narrowed the scope of the dispute to the additional 21 deputies that the sheriff was seeking to operate the new jail.

This past Friday, Frank said the salary agreement she and White signed Thursday matches the $6.6 million appropriation approved by the County Commission in June and does not contain the $7.7 million figure included in the earlier version of the salary agreement.

In addition, the sheriff agreed to 198 employees instead of 218 to reflect full funding for 15 additional jailers—and not 36, Frank said.

“(The) now-signed salary agreement answers my initial concerns over the extra million dollars and annual salaries,” Frank said. “I had made these offers before, but it is my belief that the law director was giving Sheriff White and County Commission conflicting legal advice that required the sheriff more time for legal research.”

But Yeager pinned the blame on Frank, saying the agreement reached last week could have easily been accomplished in July if she had participated in discussions with the sheriff.

Yeager said he did not draft or approve the salary agreement letter and never advocated any official or employee to file suit against the county. He said Frank’s decision to hire outside attorneys has cost Anderson County residents thousands of dollars.

Still unclear is whether outside attorneys representing Frank and White have the authority to sign an agreement that would reimburse the mayor’s legal fees from the Anderson County General Fund.

“I do have concerns about the agreed order signed by the two outside attorneys that appears to order the County Commission pay for her legal fees,” Yeager said. “The County Commission was not a party to this lawsuit, and I was denied the opportunity to be present at the mediation by the mayor’s attorney. Only County Commission can authorize budgetary expenditures from the county’s general fund and not two outside attorneys.”

See the settlement documents here: Sheriff’s Salary Suit Settlement Documents.

See the mayor’s press release: Anderson County Mayor’s Press Release.

See the law director’s press release: Anderson County Law Director’s Press Release.

See an earlier guest column by Iwanski.

More information will be added as it becomes available.

Note: This story was last updated at 9:30 a.m.

Filed Under: Anderson County, Anderson County, Government, Government, Top Stories Tagged With: Anderson County, Anderson County Commission, Anderson County Detention Facility, Anderson County Sheriff's Department, Dale C. Workman, deputies, jail, jail expansion, Jay Yeager, Knox County Circuit Court, litigation, Mark Lucas, mayor, Myron Iwanski, Paul White, salaries, salary agreement, salary suit, sheriff, Terry Frank, writ of mandamus

Advertisements


 


Join the club!

If you appreciate our work, please consider subscribing. Besides helping us, your subscription will give you access to our premium content.

Some of our stories are free, brought to you by Oak Ridge Today with help from our members—advertisers, subscribers, and sponsors.

But some are premium content, available only to members. Those are in-depth, investigative, or exclusive stories that are available only on Oak Ridge Today. They generally require significant time to report, write, and publish.

You can subscribe for as little as $5 per month.

You can read more about your options here.

We currently offer five primary subscription options to readers, and they include benefits.

Basic

  • Basic monthly subscription ($5 per month)—access premium content
  • Basic annual subscription ($60 per year)—access premium content

Pro

  • Pro monthly subscription ($10 per month)—access premium content, get breaking news emails first, and submit one press release or public service announcement per month
  • Pro annual subscription ($100 per year)—save $20 per year, access premium content, get breaking news emails first, and submit one press release or public service announcement per month

Temporary

  • Temporary access ($3 per week for two weeks)

We also have advanced subscription options. You can see them here.

We also accept donations. You can donate here.

If you prefer to send a check for a subscription or donation, you may do so by mailing one to:

Oak Ridge Today
P.O. Box 6064
Oak Ridge, TN 37831

Thank you for your consideration and for reading Oak Ridge Today. We appreciate your support.

Commenting Guidelines

We welcome comments, but we ask you to follow a few guidelines:

1) Please use your real name, including last name. Please also use a valid e-mail address.
2) Be civil. Don't insult others, attack their character, or get personal.
3) Stick to the issues.
4) No profanity.
5) Keep your comments to a reasonable length and to a reasonable number per article.

We reserve the right to remove any comments that violate these guidelines. Comments held for review, usually from those posting for the first time, may not post if they violate these guidelines. Thank you for your patience and understanding. Thank you also for reading Oak Ridge Today and for participating in the discussion.

More information is available here.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More Government News

City brush pickup continues

The annual citywide brush pickup program continues this week. During the program, which began May 8, tree limbs and bagged yard clippings/leaves will be picked up.   City collection efforts will follow the … [Read More...]

Learn about alternatives to death penalty

You can learn about alternatives to the death penalty during Lunch with the League on Tuesday, May 2. Reverend Stacy Rector, executive director of Tennesseans for Alternatives to the Death Penalty, will be the guest … [Read More...]

DOE asks for public comment about ETTP groundwater decision

The U.S. Department of Energy has asked for public comment about a proposed plan to reduce groundwater contamination in the main plant area of East Tennessee Technology Park, the former K-25 site in west Oak … [Read More...]

Governor appoints new chancellor in Anderson County

Tennessee Governor Bill Lee has appointed Wartburg attorney Jamie Brooks as chancellor for the Seventh Judicial District in Anderson County. The vacancy was created when former Chancellor M. Nichole “Nicki” Cantrell, … [Read More...]

Breakfast with Legislators on Monday

The League of Women Voters of Oak Ridge will host Breakfast with the Legislators on Monday, April 24. The breakfast is scheduled from 7:30 to 8:30 a.m. in the Social Room of the Oak Ridge Civic Center at 1403 Oak … [Read More...]

More Government

Recent Posts

  • ORNL scientist to lead project studying permafrost thaw, climate processes in Alaska
  • Community Band has Memorial Day concert
  • Outdoor Pool closed Sunday due to weather
  • Outdoor pool to re-open Friday
  • Children’s Museum to celebrate 50 years with free admission
  • Flatwater Tales Storytelling Festival returning to Oak Ridge
  • City brush pickup continues
  • ORAU employees donate more than 300 pounds of toys and household items to Holiday Bureau
  • Oak Ridge hosting three regattas this month
  • Learn about alternatives to death penalty

Search Oak Ridge Today

About Us

About Oak Ridge Today
What We Cover

How To

Advertise
Subscribe

Contact Us

Contact Oak Ridge Today

Copyright © 2023 Oak Ridge Today