• About
    • About Us
    • What We Cover
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Our Advertisers
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Send News
  • Subscribe

Oak Ridge Today

  • Home
  • Sign in
  • News
    • Business
    • Community
    • Education
    • Government
    • Health
    • Police and Fire
    • U.S. Department of Energy
    • Weather
  • Sports
    • High School
    • Middle School
    • Recreation
    • Rowing
    • Youth
  • Entertainment
    • Arts
    • Dancing
    • Movies
    • Music
    • Television
    • Theater
  • Premium Content
  • Obituaries
  • Classifieds


 







NNSA reaffirms decision to have CNS manage, operate Y-12, Pantex

Posted at 1:32 pm November 1, 2013
By John Huotari Leave a Comment

Y-12 National Security Complex Aerial View


The National Nuclear Security Administration on Friday reaffirmed its January decision to pick Consolidated Nuclear Security LLC to manage and operate the Y-12 National Security Complex in Oak Ridge and the Pantex Plant near Amarillo, Texas.

The National Nuclear Security Administration on Friday reaffirmed its January decision to pick Consolidated Nuclear Security LLC  to manage and operate the Y-12 National Security Complex in Oak Ridge and Pantex Plant near Amarillo, Texas.

That earlier decision, announced almost 10 months ago, had been challenged in two rounds of bid protests. Those protests delayed the transition to a new contractor, and it wasn’t clear Friday if the NNSA’s new decision might also be challenged.

The five-year extendable contract, which could be worth up to $22.8 billion over 10 years, includes project management of the Uranium Processing Facility at Y-12 and an unexercised option for Savannah River Tritium Operations at the Savannah River Site near Aiken, S.C.

“Our nuclear production capabilities are critical to our national security, and CNS represents the best value to the government as evidenced by its superior technical and management approach and its lower evaluated cost,” NNSA Acting Administrator Bruce Held said. “Additionally, this award puts NNSA in a position to improve mission delivery by focusing on improving the way we operate, saving taxpayer dollars, and aligning ourselves for the future.”

CNS, of Reston, Va., is comprised of Bechtel National Inc., Lockheed Martin Services Inc., ATK Launch Systems Inc., and SOC LLC. CNS will also use two subcontractors. The first, Booz Allen Hamilton Inc., will serve as a merger and transformation specialist, and the second, General Atomics, will help with Savannah River Tritium Operations if that option is exercised by NNSA in the future.

Federal officials have said the consolidated contract, the result of years of work, could save money in part by eliminating redundancies in such areas as human resources, purchasing, finance, and information technology. Earlier this year, they said the contract includes a total available fee of up to $446 million for CNS to manage the three sites for the NNSA and the U.S. Department of Energy, including the possible tritium work. CNS may also earn up to an additional $263 million as their share of savings, although the company cannot share any savings related to employee benefits.

The transition to CNS at the two nuclear weapons plants could start later this month—after the period for protests is over around Nov. 25, the NNSA said Friday afternoon. The transition could last four months, but the NNSA will ask CNS to complete the transition quicker if possible.

It wasn’t clear if the two losing teams—Integrated Nuclear Production Solutions LLC of Oak Ridge, and Nuclear Production Partners LLC, or NP2, of Lynchburg, Va.—might challenge the NNSA’s most recent decision. Federal officials declined to speculate about whether any new protests might be filed, and NP2, which is led by Babcock and Wilcox Co., or B&W, did not directly respond to a question about whether it might challenge the decision.

The NNSA, a separate agency within the U.S. Department of Energy, is hoping to avoid a third round of protests and has asked the three bidding teams if they are willing to share confidential information to help avoid challenges “based on incomplete information and suspicions that are unfounded.” All three teams will receive a debriefing.

The transition to CNS had originally been scheduled to be complete by May 1 of this year. But NP2 and Integrated Nuclear Production Solutions LLC filed bid protests, with the first filed Jan. 17. The U.S. Government Accountability Office upheld one part of those initial protests in April, and in September, it denied or dismissed new challenges filed by NP2 in June.

On Friday, CNS said it appreciated the NNSA’s reaffirmation that its contract award “provides the best value to the government for managing and operating the Pantex and Y-12 sites.”

“We have maintained a high state of readiness since the contract award in January,” spokesman Jason Bohne said. “We are prepared to resume and execute an effective transition. We look forward to working with the NNSA and with the employees of Pantex and Y-12 to ensure mission delivery with safety, security, reliability, and efficiency.”

He said more details could be available Monday.

B&W, which is now the lead management and operating contractor at Y-12 and Pantex, said it still believed its proposal was the best choice.

“We are disappointed, as we believe our proposal, including revisions submitted after the Government Accountability Office sustained our initial protest, was the strongest choice, as originally determined by the Source Evaluation Board,” said George Dudich, president of Babcock and Wilcox Technical Services Group Inc. “We will carefully evaluate information received during NNSA’s debriefing process in determining our next steps. In the interest of ensuring a transparent process, our team agreed to an open, two-part debrief, and we hope that will be possible.”

Besides B&W, other members of the NP2 team are URS, Northrop Grumman, and Honeywell.

“We remain committed to making contributions to national security and providing exceptional service to the U.S. Department of Energy and NNSA,” Dudich said.

The Integrated Nuclear Production Solutions team includes Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. and Fluor Federal Services Inc. A spokeswoman for that team has not responded to an e-mailed request for comment.

Y-12 is currently operated by B&W Y-12, a partnership of the Babcock and Wilcox Co., of Charlotte, N.C., and Bechtel Corp. Meanwhile, Pantex is managed and operated by Babcock & Wilcox Technical Services Pantex LLC. Bechtel, which has operational headquarters in Reston, Va., is a partner on that project as well.

The B&W-led companies have held the Y-12 contract since 2000 and the Pantex contract since 2001, spokeswoman Aimee Mills said.

This would be the NNSA’s first consolidated contract, federal officials said earlier this year. They said CNS had promised to save the federal government $3.27 billion during the next decade, although the details haven’t been publicly released and it wasn’t clear if that promise remained in effect. According to federal officials, the company also had said that it expects to offer jobs to more than 95 percent of the current employees, although that number could be affected by voluntary retirements and other departures.

Note: This story was last updated at 3:40 p.m. Nov. 2.

Filed Under: National Nuclear Security Administration, Top Stories, Y-12 National Security Complex Tagged With: Aimee Mills, ATK Launch Systems Inc., B&W, B&W Y-12, Babcock & Wilcox Technical Services Pantex LLC, Babcock and Wilcox Co., Babcock and Wilcox Technical Services Group Inc., Bechtel National Inc., bid protests, Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. General Atomics, Bruce Held, CNS, consolidated contract, Consolidated Nuclear Security, contract, Fluor Federal Services Inc., George Dudich, Government Accountability Office, Honeywell, Integrated Nuclear Production Solutions LLC, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc., Jason Bohne, jobs, Lockheed Martin Services Inc., National Nuclear Security Administration, NNSA, Northrop Grumman, NP2, nuclear production, Nuclear Production Partners LLC, nuclear weapons plants, Pantex Plant, proposal, Savannah River Site, Savannah River Tritium Operations, SOC LLC, U.S. Department of Energy, uranium processing facility, URS, Y-12, Y-12 National Security Complex

Advertisements

 

Join the club!

If you appreciate our work, please consider subscribing. Besides helping us, your subscription will give you access to our premium content.

Most of our stories are free, brought to you by Oak Ridge Today with help from our members—advertisers, subscribers, and sponsors.

But some are premium content, available only to members. Those are in-depth, investigative, or exclusive stories that are available only on Oak Ridge Today. They generally require at least four hours to report, write, and publish.

You can subscribe for as little as $5 per month.

You can read more about your options here.

We currently offer five primary subscription options to readers, and they include benefits.

Basic

  • Basic monthly subscription ($5 per month)—access premium content
  • Basic annual subscription ($60 per year)—access premium content

Pro

  • Pro monthly subscription ($10 per month)—access premium content, get breaking news emails first, and submit one press release or public service announcement per month
  • Pro annual subscription ($100 per year)—save $20 per year, access premium content, get breaking news emails first, and submit one press release or public service announcement per month

Temporary

  • Temporary access ($3 per week for two weeks)

We also have advanced subscription options. You can see them here.

We also accept donations. You can donate here.

If you prefer to send a check for a subscription or donation, you may do so by mailing one to:

Oak Ridge Today
P.O. Box 6064
Oak Ridge, TN 37831

Thank you for your consideration and for reading Oak Ridge Today. We appreciate your support.

Commenting Guidelines

We welcome comments, but we ask you to follow a few guidelines:

1) Please use your real name, including last name. Please also use a valid e-mail address.
2) Be civil. Don't insult others, attack their character, or get personal.
3) Stick to the issues.
4) No profanity.
5) Keep your comments to a reasonable length and to a reasonable number per article.

We reserve the right to remove any comments that violate these guidelines. Comments held for review, usually from those posting for the first time, may not post if they violate these guidelines. Thank you for your patience and understanding. Thank you also for reading Oak Ridge Today and for participating in the discussion.

More information is available here.

Recent Posts

  • Council to consider accepting airport grants
  • Police chief to speak to League of Women Voters on Tuesday
  • Martin Luther King Jr. celebration will feature ORHS principal
  • Controlled burns start this week on DOE land
  • Current status of city facilities due to COVID
  • Rep. Fleischmann tests positive for COVID
  • Oak Ridge man charged with second robbery
  • Mason, an IDB member, community volunteer, dies of COVID complications
  • Tammy Dunn appointed Oak Ridge city attorney
  • Which Wich closes

Recent Comments

  • Matt Bailey on Dodson also wants to serve as mayor pro tem
  • Mark Caldwell on Dodson also wants to serve as mayor pro tem
  • Matt Bailey on Dodson also wants to serve as mayor pro tem
  • Mark Caldwell on Dodson also wants to serve as mayor pro tem
  • Matt Bailey on Dodson also wants to serve as mayor pro tem
  • Tracy Powers on Planning Commission to consider Main Street apartments, plan revisions
  • johnhuotari on Four incumbents re-elected to Oak Ridge City Council
  • Levi D. Smith on Four incumbents re-elected to Oak Ridge City Council
  • samuel hopwood on Housing: Apartments proposed on former AMSE site
  • Matt Bailey on Robin Smith named Oak Ridge police chief

Search Oak Ridge Today

About Us

About Oak Ridge Today
What We Cover

How To

Advertise
Subscribe

Contact Us

Contact Oak Ridge Today

Copyright © 2021 Oak Ridge Today