• About
    • About Us
    • What We Cover
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Our Advertisers
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Send News
  • Subscribe

Oak Ridge Today

  • Home
  • Sign in
  • News
    • Business
    • Community
    • Education
    • Government
    • Health
    • Police and Fire
    • U.S. Department of Energy
    • Weather
  • Sports
    • High School
    • Middle School
    • Recreation
    • Rowing
    • Youth
  • Entertainment
    • Arts
    • Dancing
    • Movies
    • Music
    • Television
    • Theater
  • Premium Content
  • Obituaries
  • Classifieds

 

City doesn’t plan to appeal Applewood demolition decision

Posted at 5:56 pm November 5, 2012
By John Huotari 4 Comments

Note: This story was updated on Nov. 7 to include links to the opinion.

The city’s top legal official on Monday said he doesn’t plan to appeal an appellate court decision that sent the order to demolish four Applewood Apartment buildings back to a municipal board.

“I don’t want to hold this up by appealing this any further,” Oak Ridge City Attorney Ken Krushenski said. “We’re going to do what the Court of Appeals said.”

The Oak Ridge Board of Building and Housing Code Appeals ordered the buildings demolished on Nov. 11, 2010. The order was upheld by the Anderson County Chancery Court, but Applewood Apartments owner Joseph J. Levitt Jr., a Knoxville attorney, appealed.

In a three-judge opinion filed Oct. 30, the Tennessee Court of Appeals in Knoxville said the Board of Building and Housing Code Appeals “acted without material evidence to support its decision to demolish the buildings.”

The appellate court said the board may only order demolitions when repair costs exceed 50 percent of property values. However, no evidence was presented at the 2010 Applewood hearing about the original condition or value of the buildings, or the repair costs, the court said.

The city won on all other issues, Krushenski said.

“As far as we’re concerned, everything else is over with,” he said.

Krushenski said the Board of Building and Housing Code Appeals will now have an evidentiary hearing that will be limited to the building and repair costs. He said the board will be able to consider demolition orders if repair costs exceed more than 50 percent of building values. A hearing date hasn’t been set yet.

In its opinion, the Court of Appeals said board member Joe Lee “moved to order the demolition of the subject buildings because he believed that (Levitt) had already been given an adequate amount of time in which to repair the buildings.

“While (the) owner’s continued noncompliance may have been infuriating to the board, the board did not have the power to order the demolition of property simply because owner failed to follow directions,” the court said.

The other issues reviewed by the court ranged from the constitutionality of administrative warrants used to inspect Applewood buildings to Lee’s alleged bias against Levitt.

Levitt could appeal the court’s decision to the Tennessee Supreme Court. He wasn’t available for comment late Monday afternoon

There are total of 10 Applewood Apartment buildings that have been ordered demolished. Krushenski said the other six demolition cases are pending in Anderson County Chancery Court.

The Oak Ridge City Court has ordered that three more buildings be repaired. That order has been appealed to Anderson County Circuit Court, Krushenski said.

The city has fought a code enforcement battle against the 13-building apartment complex on Hillside Road and Hunter Circle for several years. City officials say they want the buildings repaired, while Levitt says he has made repairs.

You can read the opinion here.

Filed Under: Government, Top Stories Tagged With: Applewood Apartments, Joseph J. Levitt Jr., Ken Krushenski, Oak Ridge Board of Building and Housing Code Appeals, Tennessee Court of Appeals

Advertisements

 


Join the club!

If you appreciate our work, please consider subscribing. Besides helping us, your subscription will give you access to our premium content.

Some of our stories are free, brought to you by Oak Ridge Today with help from our members—advertisers, subscribers, and sponsors.

But some are premium content, available only to members. Those are in-depth, investigative, or exclusive stories that are available only on Oak Ridge Today. They generally require significant time to report, write, and publish.

You can subscribe for as little as $5 per month.

You can read more about your options here.

We currently offer five primary subscription options to readers, and they include benefits.

Basic

  • Basic monthly subscription ($5 per month)—access premium content
  • Basic annual subscription ($60 per year)—access premium content

Pro

  • Pro monthly subscription ($10 per month)—access premium content, get breaking news emails first, and submit one press release or public service announcement per month
  • Pro annual subscription ($100 per year)—save $20 per year, access premium content, get breaking news emails first, and submit one press release or public service announcement per month

Temporary

  • Temporary access ($3 per week for two weeks)

We also have advanced subscription options. You can see them here.

We also accept donations. You can donate here.

If you prefer to send a check for a subscription or donation, you may do so by mailing one to:

Oak Ridge Today
P.O. Box 6064
Oak Ridge, TN 37831

Thank you for your consideration and for reading Oak Ridge Today. We appreciate your support.

Commenting Guidelines

We welcome comments, but we ask you to follow a few guidelines:

1) Please use your real name, including last name. Please also use a valid e-mail address.
2) Be civil. Don't insult others, attack their character, or get personal.
3) Stick to the issues.
4) No profanity.
5) Keep your comments to a reasonable length and to a reasonable number per article.

We reserve the right to remove any comments that violate these guidelines. Comments held for review, usually from those posting for the first time, may not post if they violate these guidelines. Thank you for your patience and understanding. Thank you also for reading Oak Ridge Today and for participating in the discussion.

More information is available here.

Comments

  1. Kay Williamson says

    November 5, 2012 at 6:22 pm

    WHY does this not surprise me!! WHAT HAPPENED TO ‘NOT IN OUR CITY’, I guess this was just a little to much work for the people in city hall. Doesn’t the city control lights in theses buildings, and water department, people won’t live in the dark with no water,,,

    Reply
    • John Huotari says

      November 6, 2012 at 1:17 am

      We’ll let you know when the Board of Building and Housing Code Appeals meeting is scheduled. It should be an interesting meeting.

      Reply
  2. Ellen Smith says

    November 7, 2012 at 2:42 pm

    It’s my understanding (but I’ve not seen the court decision) that the Court of Appeals sided with the city on all of the legal questions in this case. The only issue is a factual one — whether the repair costs exceed 50 percent of property value. That can be determined by the city board without further judicial action.

    The city isn’t planning to appeal the court decision because the city won. There are no legal questions for the city to appeal at this time.

    Reply
    • John Huotari says

      November 7, 2012 at 5:04 pm

      My interpretation of what City Attorney Ken Krushenski said is similar to what you are saying. Krushenski said the city won on all the issues except this one.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More Government News

Eby elected chair of state school board

Bob Eby, a former chair and vice chair of the Oak Ridge school board, has been elected chair of the Tennessee State Board of Education. He will serve a two-year term. Eby was appointed to the state school board by … [Read More...]

McNally has pacemaker surgery

Tennessee Lieutenant Governor Randy McNally reported on Friday that he had pacemaker surgery and it went smoothly. McNally had said on his official Facebook page that, before the surgery, he had experienced the … [Read More...]

Company could evaluate leaving rail in place at airport

The Brentwood company performing preliminary studies for the proposed Oak Ridge Airport could evaluate leaving a short section of railroad in place and building a runway bridge over it. The short section of railroad … [Read More...]

Residents discuss Dollar General in Marlow

A handful of Anderson County residents have expressed mixed opinions in government meetings about a reported proposal to build a Dollar General store next to Oliver Springs Highway in Marlow, but the Anderson County … [Read More...]

Read city manager’s retirement letter

This is a copy of the January 17 retirement letter from Oak Ridge City Manager Mark Watson to the seven Oak Ridge City Council members. Since August of 2010, I have been proud to serve the City of Oak Ridge as its … [Read More...]

More Government

Recent Posts

  • Ken Tarcza, Ph.D., joins ORAU as chief of staff
  • Community Band to perform ‘Music for Spring’
  • Eight new members join DOE’s environmental advisory board
  • DOE conducting controlled burns on Oak Ridge Reservation
  • Schools publish number of open seats per school
  • History Museum to celebrate new Hutment Exhibit
  • Community Egg Hunt is Saturday, April 1
  • Austin Knight Foundation donates $5,000 to Roane State’s EMS program
  • Roane State to host Virtual FAFSA Workshop on March 24
  • Today: International Festival at Children’s Museum

Search Oak Ridge Today

About Us

About Oak Ridge Today
What We Cover

How To

Advertise
Subscribe

Contact Us

Contact Oak Ridge Today

Copyright © 2023 Oak Ridge Today