• About
    • About Us
    • What We Cover
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Our Advertisers
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Send News
  • Subscribe

Oak Ridge Today

  • Home
  • Sign in
  • News
    • Business
    • Community
    • Education
    • Government
    • Health
    • Police and Fire
    • U.S. Department of Energy
    • Weather
  • Sports
    • High School
    • Middle School
    • Recreation
    • Rowing
    • Youth
  • Entertainment
    • Arts
    • Dancing
    • Movies
    • Music
    • Television
    • Theater
  • Premium Content
  • Obituaries
  • Classifieds

 

Guest column: Oak Ridge needs debt policy, debt ceiling

Posted at 11:41 pm August 18, 2012
By Trina Baughn 2 Comments

Trina Baughn

Trina Baughn

At under 45 minutes, this month’s City Council meeting may have been the shortest meeting they’ve ever held. While it was a nice change from the normal three-hour meetings, I wonder why council didn’t take the opportunity to discuss anything of significance given our city’s various, not to mention serious, problems. After all, they are limited in how often they meet to accomplish anything. Yet, they were perfectly content to accomplish nothing.

Nearly a year ago, I wrote about our city’s debt—a bill that is quickly approaching $200 million. I implored the city to develop a debt policy that would establish a debt ceiling, a debt reduction plan, and parameters for borrowing.

In December, it appeared that council might actually achieve this. Instead, they settled for a watered-down version to meet a basic state requirement. They promised, though, that by the spring of 2012, they would begin working on a “real” debt policy.

Spring has come and gone, and summer is coming to a close. Council has yet to even discuss scheduling a discussion of a debt policy. Our debt is not a priority.

Should it be? Perhaps we should look at our borrowing history (for which we are still paying), to begin to answer that question.

In 1988, the city issued $10 million for street improvements and to renovate Willow Brook and Woodland elementary schools. Though we’ve yet to pay off this debt, we just spent another $1 million to correct structural issues at Woodland.

In 1989, they issued $5.4 million to build Glenwood Elementary School. This school is now so underused that Board of Education member Bob Eby has suggested the possibility of consolidating two schools into one. That same suggestion was floated last year as a possible solution to the structural issues at Woodland. It wasn’t given serious discussion either time.

In 1991, they issued $5 million to renovate the public pool, two fire stations, and to build another new fire station.

In 1995, they issued $11 million for the “renovation of the high school and two city middle schools.” Note that these renovations preceded the $66.5 million high school renovation that would begin 10 years later.

Also in 1995, they issued $1.2 million to purchase land for Roane State Community College. The city recently borrowed another $500,000 to expand their campus.

In 1996, they borrowed $16 million to build a new central services complex, make improvements to Linden Elementary School, construct three new ball fields, and make road improvements.

In 1998, they borrowed $7.3 million to build a city-owned golf course. This golf course was never expected to be profitable, rather it was to attract new residents. The mantra that “you’ve got to spend money to make money” transcended to “you’ve got to lose money to make money.” This venture failed so badly that council couldn’t even get an offer when they tried to sell it to a private investor. Fourteen years later, we are still on the hook for this debt for over $4 million.

Also in 1998, they issued $3.2 million to demolish the old central services building, enhance roads and greenways, and miscellaneous school projects.

In 2000, they issued $10 million. Half went to city projects including greenway and road expansions as well as storm water drainage improvements (sound familiar?). The other half went to making upgrades at the high school and two middle schools as well as Linden Elementary School.

Then, between the years of 2004-2009, with the approval of the voters for no more than $58 million, they issued $66.5 million for the high school renovation project. Due to four years of non-payment, this debt has only decreased to $62.7 million.

This listing was extracted from the 2012 city budget narratives and though not all-inclusive, you can fully expect the city to attempt to issue more debt in the next six to 12 months.

We are at a crossroads. You have a choice. You have a say. You can choose to hold your local government, the level of government that has the greatest impact on your finances, accountable. Or, you can do like so many have already done (and more will soon follow) and just move away, leaving the rest of us to figure it out.

I don’t know about you, but I’m not a quitter. I’m not giving up that easily. I’ve made Oak Ridge my home, and I intend to be here for a long, long time. I do not intend, however, to continue down this same path of spending without limits or consideration for the future.

Filed Under: 2012 Election, Guest Columns Tagged With: borrowing, City Council, debt, debt ceiling, debt policy, Oak Ridge

Advertisements

 


Join the club!

If you appreciate our work, please consider subscribing. Besides helping us, your subscription will give you access to our premium content.

Some of our stories are free, brought to you by Oak Ridge Today with help from our members—advertisers, subscribers, and sponsors.

But some are premium content, available only to members. Those are in-depth, investigative, or exclusive stories that are available only on Oak Ridge Today. They generally require significant time to report, write, and publish.

You can subscribe for as little as $5 per month.

You can read more about your options here.

We currently offer five primary subscription options to readers, and they include benefits.

Basic

  • Basic monthly subscription ($5 per month)—access premium content
  • Basic annual subscription ($60 per year)—access premium content

Pro

  • Pro monthly subscription ($10 per month)—access premium content, get breaking news emails first, and submit one press release or public service announcement per month
  • Pro annual subscription ($100 per year)—save $20 per year, access premium content, get breaking news emails first, and submit one press release or public service announcement per month

Temporary

  • Temporary access ($3 per week for two weeks)

We also have advanced subscription options. You can see them here.

We also accept donations. You can donate here.

If you prefer to send a check for a subscription or donation, you may do so by mailing one to:

Oak Ridge Today
P.O. Box 6064
Oak Ridge, TN 37831

Thank you for your consideration and for reading Oak Ridge Today. We appreciate your support.

Commenting Guidelines

We welcome comments, but we ask you to follow a few guidelines:

1) Please use your real name, including last name. Please also use a valid e-mail address.
2) Be civil. Don't insult others, attack their character, or get personal.
3) Stick to the issues.
4) No profanity.
5) Keep your comments to a reasonable length and to a reasonable number per article.

We reserve the right to remove any comments that violate these guidelines. Comments held for review, usually from those posting for the first time, may not post if they violate these guidelines. Thank you for your patience and understanding. Thank you also for reading Oak Ridge Today and for participating in the discussion.

More information is available here.

Comments

  1. Myra Mansfield says

    August 19, 2012 at 1:58 pm

    This is serious business – $200,000,000 debt to somehow pay from the income of a 29,000 person community with its share of low and fixed income residents, barely-taxed open spaces, and discount-taxed commercial and government properties. I’m afraid we need more than a balanced budget, spending/debt boundaries, and priorities. We need a MIRACLE! Thanks Trina for bringing this to light again.

    Reply
  2. Peggy Tiner says

    August 20, 2012 at 2:56 pm

    It has been a long time since we have had a city council that seemed aware of its responsibility to the citizens. How can they be induced to make tough decisions?

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Ken Tarcza, Ph.D., joins ORAU as chief of staff
  • Community Band to perform ‘Music for Spring’
  • Eight new members join DOE’s environmental advisory board
  • DOE conducting controlled burns on Oak Ridge Reservation
  • Schools publish number of open seats per school
  • History Museum to celebrate new Hutment Exhibit
  • Community Egg Hunt is Saturday, April 1
  • Austin Knight Foundation donates $5,000 to Roane State’s EMS program
  • Roane State to host Virtual FAFSA Workshop on March 24
  • Today: International Festival at Children’s Museum

Search Oak Ridge Today

About Us

About Oak Ridge Today
What We Cover

How To

Advertise
Subscribe

Contact Us

Contact Oak Ridge Today

Copyright © 2023 Oak Ridge Today