• About
    • About Us
    • What We Cover
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Our Advertisers
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Send News

Oak Ridge Today

  • Home
  • Sign in
  • News
    • Business
    • Community
    • Education
    • Government
    • Health
    • Police and Fire
    • U.S. Department of Energy
    • Weather
  • Sports
    • High School
    • Middle School
    • Recreation
    • Rowing
    • Youth
  • Entertainment
    • Arts
    • Dancing
    • Movies
    • Music
    • Television
    • Theater
  • Premium Content
  • Obituaries
  • Classifieds

Letter: Unbridled defense of Mayor Frank challenged

Posted at 1:19 am April 7, 2014
By Oak Ridge Today Letters 19 Comments

Myron Iwanski

Myron Iwanski

Note: Anderson County Commissioner Myron Iwanski wrote this letter in response to a March letter by Clinton resident Stephen Flick.

To the Editor:

In a guest column, Stephen Flick states that my question to the mayor about the recent state audit was intended to embarrass and harass the mayor. A little background might help explain why I raised the question.

The recently completed State Financial Audit for Anderson County raised serious concerns about overspending by $22,740 on a salary in one of the mayor’s offices—which is in violation of state law. The audit finding and responses are available on the state website here on pages 252 and 253.

As noted in the audit report, of particular concern to the auditors was that this overspending occurred after County Commission twice turned down the mayor’s requests for this funding increase and that the mayor knowingly overspent on this salary anyway.

This is the first time in my 20 years on the Audit Committee that we have had a finding like this.

The County Audit Committee, which I chair, always asks affected department heads and elected officials to provide an explanation of what they have done to correct their audit finding and what they have done to prevent the finding in the future.

Mayor Frank did not attend the Audit Committee meeting to explain her response. The written response to this audit finding attacked the state auditors for making this a finding. This written response did not make it clear that the mayor would not overspend such accounts again. Therefore, Audit Committee members asked that the administration provide such assurances before County Commission approves closing out the audit finding.

At the full County Commission meeting when I presented my Audit Committee report and closing the finding was to be discussed and voted on, I asked the mayor if she could provide such assurances. She did not.

It is very important that the fiscal checks and balances required by state laws are followed by all county officials—including the mayor.

Myron Iwanski

Anderson County Commissioner

Audit Committee Chairman

Filed Under: Letters, Opinion Tagged With: Anderson County, Anderson County Commission, Audit Committee, audit finding, financial audit, mayor, Myron Iwanski, state audit, Stephen Flick

Comments

  1. Pat Fain says

    April 7, 2014 at 10:11 am

    I have been watching the controversy over the county matter of the Mayor spending money not appropriated by the Commission and the further matter of the state audit findings and the Commission Audit Committee’s questions and requirements. I am disgusted that there appears to be continued charges of politization over what is in reality a clear matter of law and the violation of that law. I was very happy to have the previous Mayor removed from office for a violation of law. I can only wonder why the identical standards are not being applied to the current Mayor. Pat Fain

    Reply
    • Rob Woodward says

      April 8, 2014 at 12:47 am

      Pat, are you accusing the Mayor of committing a crime?

      Reply
      • Charlie Jernigan says

        April 8, 2014 at 12:34 pm

        From the letter:
        “It is very important that the fiscal checks and balances required by
        state laws are followed by all county officials—including the mayor.”

        Reply
    • Harry Pruitt says

      April 11, 2014 at 3:48 pm

      Yes, the political season is off and running Pat and you, Myron and our other Democratic friends are already in full bloom. But the plain truth is that until a viable Democratic candidate can be persuaded to run for county Mayor, rather than just a sacrificial lamb as in the past several decades, the Republicans And Mayor Frank will continue to hold that office. She won in a landslide in the last election against the best that Oak Ridge, and a few renegade Republicans, could offer. The voters love her.

      Happy Trails!!

      Reply
      • Myron Iwanski says

        April 19, 2014 at 8:34 pm

        Are you saying the state audit report is political?? The State Comptroller is a Republican appointed by a Republican Governor. Go back and read the audit report that my response to Mr. Flick was based on.
        Maybe you haven’t noticed that Zach Bates is running as a Republican for Mayor. He, like many other republicans supported Mayor Frank in the last election, but decided we need to move in a more positive direction. Don’t count Zach out just yet.

        Reply
        • Harry Pruitt says

          April 20, 2014 at 7:53 am

          I never count anyone out Myron. Zack is a fine young man who with a few more years of experience will do well in politics or any other field he chooses. You and our Democratic friends are so desperate to defeat Mayor Frank – you can’t bully her – that you are pulling out all the stops in that effort. I’m just saying that most folks in Anderson County are too intelligent to buy what you are selling.

          Happy Trails!!
          –

          Reply
  2. Ellen Smith says

    April 8, 2014 at 1:49 pm

    Officials need to take audit findings very seriously — and this is a very serious finding.

    Reply
    • Rob Woodward says

      April 9, 2014 at 10:44 pm

      How seriously should we really take it? Didn’t the state award the Budget Director an award for excellence and yet name the Director of Budgets as having an irregularity?

      Reply
      • Curt Kelsey says

        April 10, 2014 at 9:12 pm

        Here’s a question that many would like to have Myron Iwanski answer concerning his approving over $50,000 in expenditures not provided in the budget.

        http://www.actaxpayers.org/county-commission.html

        Why would they have passed the increase? There are a few possible options.

        1) They did not realize the spending increase was in there. (Always a possibility in lengthy legislation)

        2) They did not realize that such expenditures violate the law, and they relied on the legal opinions of others. (This should not be the case for Commissioners Creasey, Fritts, Alderson, White, and Iwanski who were on the commission in 2006 when this law was passed)

        3) They just hoped no one would notice it. (I hope this one is not the case)

        Reply
    • Rob Woodward says

      April 9, 2014 at 10:55 pm

      If I recall correctly, Mr. Iwanski and the rest of the Commission waxed poetically about how blessed our humble county was to have such a fine, exceptional Budget Director and how painstaking the process was to try to find a replacement for the Budget Director during his candidate search and yet somehow the Budget Director has been spared the ire of Mr. Iwanski despite being cited here for irregularities.

      Also curiously absent are Mr. Iwanski’s grave concerns over other departments budget deficiencies name in the audit. I suppose they will be covered in future opinion pieces from Mr. Iwanski. The public anxiously awaits.

      Reply
  3. Eileen Slater says

    April 8, 2014 at 5:17 pm

    Mr. Houtari: Why is Dr. Flick’s letter on this site dated April 7, and yet it is implied in your note as having been received in March? Since Dr. Flick’s letter does not come up under your “Opinion” tab I am assuming you have printed a letter which was released elsewhere so Mr. Iwanski would have the convenience of lambasting it here.

    Dr. Flick expressed his opinion regarding the hard-ball politics the he has personally observed being played out in our county courthouse some weeks ago. Mr. Iwanski’s contrived response to it here is evidence of those politics.

    And why is he bringing this up just now? Maybe so he can try to deflect attention for the county schools’ spending scandals by attacking the mayor?

    Reply
    • Myron Iwanski says

      April 9, 2014 at 3:04 pm

      Let me assure you this finding was handled by the Audit Committee in the same manner any other similar finding is handled. It is my and the Committees duty to review these findings and do what we can to keep them from happening again.

      My question at the full County Commission meeting a three months ago was simply to address a concern of the Committee. I had nothing to do with the timing of Mr. Flick’s recent letter to the editor attacking me in the Clinton Courier and then Oak Ridge Today. I responded as soon as I was made aware of his comments because some of his comments were directed at me.

      I welcome public comments on county commission issues. My response to Mr. Flick’s letter to the editor was only to explain the County Commission’s role in dealing with findings and the facts of this finding based what is in the audit report.

      Reply
      • Kelsey Curtis says

        April 9, 2014 at 4:07 pm

        Let me assure you folks.The quest by Iwanski to mislead people about our Mayor will continue. She has done a great job in spite of Myron’s unwillingness as a commissioner to work with the Mayor.

        Reply
      • Curt Kelsey says

        April 10, 2014 at 12:25 pm

        http://www.actaxpayers.org/county-commission.html

        Where are you on this Myron?

        Reply
        • Charlie Jernigan says

          April 11, 2014 at 11:46 am

          Curt, you are correct about actaxpayers.org are here to defend the mayor. My question is when are they going to comply with campaign finance laws?

          Reply
        • Myron Iwanski says

          April 11, 2014 at 12:02 pm

          Mr. Kelsey, With all due respect to Alex Mosley who works for your small lobbying enterprise, I will get my legal advice on this and other legal matters from our attorney rather than Mr. Mosley.

          Reply
      • Myra Mansfield says

        April 15, 2014 at 9:18 am

        Mr. Iwanski, As you know I am a candidate for Dist 8 County Commission and intend to take it very seriously. I am trying to learn the processes and rules at this time and have a sincere question. Does the person serving as Mayor have any leeway and right to personal discretion in hiring and appointments of positions such as this one being questioned?

        Reply
        • Myron Iwanski says

          April 15, 2014 at 3:13 pm

          Good question. Elected office holders, including the Mayor, can hire or appoint who they want, except for a few positions that by state law require County Commission confirmation. As a matter of policy, commission has asked that all positions be advertised to help ensure the most qualified person is hired. Most department heads and elected officials advertise their positions.
          This audit finding was not about who was hired, but that there were no funds in this particular personnel code to pay for this position. By state law moving any money into and out of a personnel code requires County Commission approval. If this law were not in place or not followed, there would be uncontrolled hiring by department heads and elected officials that would obligate the county to reoccurring expenses, This would make it very difficult for County Commission to control spending and avoid tax increases.

          Reply
    • johnhuotari says

      April 11, 2014 at 12:41 am

      Eileen,

      We did have a technical issue in the past few days that appeared to create an issue where the most recent content did not always display on our archive pages, such as the Opinion page. I’m not sure if that’s because we recently integrated our site with CloudFlare, a move designed to help speed up page load times, or because our caching plugin needed to be updated. In any case, I have updated our caching plugin and tried to make a few additional configuration changes to ensure that all the most recent content is displaying on all the archives pages, including News, Entertainment, Opinion, and Obituaries. Thank you for bringing this to my attention, and please let me know if you think there is any content that is not displaying.

      Regarding publication times, we do try to publish all content as quickly as we can, but we aren’t always able to publish as quickly as we would like. I apologize if this causes any inconvenience. We are taking two specific steps to improve our performance. My wife, Dawn, is again helping more with press releases and obituaries, and we have a freelance reporter, Sara Wise, helping us with some stories. Combined, I am confident that these two steps will help us improve our ability to publish quickly.

      I hope that helps. Please let me know if you have any other questions.

      Thank you,

      John

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More Opinion

Letter: Submarine Veterans base commander ‘very disappointed’ with festival this year

To the Editor: The Smoky Mountain Submarine Veterans, the Knoxville chapter of the United States Submarine Veterans, has had a booth and performed a Tolling of the Boats Ceremony at the Secret City Festival for the … [Read More...]

Five ways to foster resilience in young children

By Marjorie Alcorn: Home Visitor Healthy Families Tennessee/Prevent Child Abuse Tennessee East Region Resilience is defined as the ability to thrive, adapt and cope despite tough and stressful times. It’s a natural … [Read More...]

Letter: Oak Ridge Country Club responds to comments made at Council meeting

Editor's note: This is a letter sent to Oak Ridge City Council by the Oak Ridge Country Club in response to comments made during a City Council meeting in January, when Council considered whether to provide $120,000 … [Read More...]

Opinion: How far can we move the needle?

By Ron Woody The buzz around the Roane County Courthouse and School Board has been what will our leaders do about the future of education in Roane County? The initial discussions were about consolidation of high … [Read More...]

Billy Paul Sams

Letter: Anderson County Bar Association wants to name law library after Billy Sams

Editor's note: The Anderson County Bar Association and legal community is proceeding with an effort to name the Anderson County Law Library after Billy Sams because "you never saw him without a book in his hands." Here … [Read More...]

More Opinion

Recent Posts

  • Flatwater Tales Storytelling Festival Announces 2025 Storytellers
  • Laser-Engraved Bricks Will Line Walkway of New Chamber Headquarters
  • Democratic Women’s Club to Discuss Climate Change, Energy and Policy
  • Estate Jewelry Show at Karen’s Jewelers Features Celebrity Jewelry
  • Keri Cagle named new ORAU senior vice president and ORISE director
  • ORAU Annual Giving Campaign exceeds $100,000 goal+ORAU Annual Giving Campaign exceeds $100,000 goal More than $1 million raised in past 10 years benefits United Way and Community Shares Oak Ridge, Tenn. —ORAU exceeded its goal of raising $100,000 in donations as part of its internal annual giving campaign that benefits the United Way and Community Shares nonprofit organizations. ORAU has raised more than $1 million over the past 10 years through this campaign. A total of $126,839 was pledged during the 2024 ORAU Annual Giving Campaign. Employees donate via payroll deduction and could earmark their donation for United Way, Community Shares or both. “ORAU has remained a strong pillar in the community for more than 75 years, and we encourage our employees to consider participating in our annual giving campaign each year to help our less fortunate neighbors in need,” said ORAU President and CEO Andy Page. “Each one of our employees has the power to positively impact the lives of those who need help in the communities where we do business across the country and demonstrate the ORAU way – taking care of each other.” ORAU, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit corporation, provides science, health and workforce solutions that address national priorities and serve the public interest. Through our specialized teams of experts and access to a consortium of more than 150 major Ph.D.-granting institutions, ORAU works with federal, state, local and commercial customers to provide innovative scientific and technical solutions and help advance their missions. ORAU manages the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). Learn more about ORAU at www.orau.org. Learn more about ORAU at www.orau.org. Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/OakRidgeAssociatedUniversities Follow us on X (formerly Twitter): https://twitter.com/orau Follow us on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/orau ###
  • Children’s Museum Gala Celebrates the Rainforest
  • Jim Sears joins ORAU as senior vice president
  • Oak Ridge Housing Authority Receives Funding Assistance of up to $51.8 Million For Renovating Public Housing and Building New Workforce Housing
  • Two fires reported early Friday

Search Oak Ridge Today

Copyright © 2025 Oak Ridge Today