Note: This story was last updated at 4:17 p.m. March 24.
Oak Ridge City Council could consider extending the controversial traffic camera contract on Monday, but not without some changes. Among the proposed changes are mobile units, different camera locations, and a new revenue split between the city and the camera vendor, Redflex Traffic Systems Inc., of Phoenix, Ariz.
On Thursday, Redflex said it is negotiating these and other issues with Oak Ridge officials.
“Redflex is very proud of our five-year public safety partnership with the City of Oak Ridge,†said Jody Ryan, Redflex communications director. “We are prepared to discuss various options to ensure the city’s traffic safety camera program is comprehensive and provides the highest public safety value.â€
Council has been presented two options to consider during a special Monday night meeting. One would extend the five-year contract for two years with the changes. A second would end the program when the current agreement expires April 21.
Even camera supporters have said the city ought to keep a greater percentage of the revenues. Of the $6.2 million generated so far, Redflex has kept about $3.6 million, while the city has collected $2.6 million, or roughly 42 percent.
For critics, the four traffic cameras have been an irritant since they were installed, a detriment to visitors and businesses, an undesirable surveillance tool, and an unwelcome outsourcing of a police function.
“These red-light cameras are a $6 million tax,†Oak Ridge resident T.J. Garland told Council members during a March 3 meeting, when they postponed a vote.
“I would rather put officers out into the community,†resident Kay Williamson said.
Before postponing the vote earlier this month, the Council had agreed, in a 4-1-1 vote, to amend a resolution extending the contract in order to allow camera locations to be changed, use mobile units, and renegotiate the revenue split from the $50 citations issued by the automated devices.
Supporters have said the four systems installed on busy roadways in April 2009 have helped slow down traffic, reduced car crashes, and provided extra revenues to the city, including for community safety projects.
“I think the program has worked great,†resident Joe Lee said. “It’s not been a disaster for the community.â€
Ryan, the Redflex spokesperson, called the results of the first five years promising.
“Crashes have decreased 33 percent from the inception of the program compared to four years ago at the Oak Ridge Turnpike at Lafayette Drive,†Ryan said. “The data also shows that school zone speed has decreased, indicating the program is modifying drivers’ behavior. Additionally, the City of Oak Ridge uses the fines from photo enforcement citations to improve roadway safety. To date, nearly $350,000 has been allocated to improvements, making roads safer for drivers, pedestrians, and other road users.â€
Ryan suggested Redflex could be willing to consider other camera locations, if that’s what Council members want.
“The purpose of photo enforcement is to modify driver behavior on the most dangerous roadways,†Ryan said. “Redflex is willing to work in partnership with the city to examine what other areas of the community might benefit from photo enforcement. This is the city’s program; decisions regarding additional photo enforcement systems would need to be agreed on by the city.â€
Under changes to state law, a city-funded traffic study will have to be performed before new camera locations can be considered.
If the traffic camera program is not extended, the city staff has asked Council to consider installing a traffic signal in front of the Oak Ridge High School on Oak Ridge Turnpike.
The high school stoplight would have to be approved by the Tennessee Department of Transportation. It could cost $150,000 to $200,000 and take nine months to install.
There are four traffic camera systems in Oak Ridge now. Two issue $50 citations to drivers who speed or run red lights. They are installed at Oak Ridge Turnpike and Lafayette Drive/New York Avenue, and Robertsville Road and North Illinois Avenue.
The other two systems issue citations only for speeding. They are installed in front of Oak Ridge High School on Oak Ridge Turnpike, and on Robertsville Road near Willow Brook Elementary School and Robertsville Middle School.
The special City Council meeting starts at 7 p.m. Monday in the Oak Ridge Municipal Building Courtroom.
See the agenda here.
Angi Agle says
By all means, put one at Emory Valley Road and Briarcliff Ave! Why should the West end have all the safety benefits? Seriously, I’m in favor of keeping the cameras, but improving the City’s revenue split. Fines from cameras in school zones should go to school safety projects.
Jason Allison says
I agree somewhat. I would have to argue the “safety” increases are way inflated compared to drivers either modifying their driving or just completely avoiding the areas all together. Another point that is highly disturbing, out of 2.6 million, the city has only spent $350,000 on actual safety improvements? One would think 100% of the revenues from the cameras would go to safety. Where are the other monies going? This money should go exclusively to traffic and/or pedestrian safety improvements. There should be no reason, what so ever, the city only get 42% of the revenues either. If we’re paying for the cameras, they’re ours and redflex should only get maybe 20-25% of the money, if that.
Kay Williamson says
Jason there really are no community benefits to having red light camera’s, they do not stop or slow down someone that is speeding or going to speed, they merely record a transaction. These tickets are unenforceable and not even worth the paper they are printed on. We as taxpayers just spent 500,000 dollars so officers can write a ticket in less than two minutes (according to them), A red light camera does not stop drug dealers, save anyone’s life,stop someone with a gun, they call them safety camera’s then why DID THEY HAVE TO BRIBE GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL to get them into towns???
Jason Allison says
Kay, I respect you highly and I agree with a lot that you say and do, howeverer, this is one issue we do not agree with each other on. Out of respect (for you, because not only do you deserve it you’ve earned it) my comment on this issue will be left with what I have already said.
johnhuotari says
Jason,
I should have double-checked that $350,000. I added up spending from the Special Program Fund from Fiscal Year 2012 to Fiscal Year 2014, using numbers I previously reported and excluding any money for a police officer’s salary, and I came up with a number closer to $530,000. You can see revenues and expenditures in this earlier story: http://oakridgetoday.com/2014/03/02/traffic-camera-revenues-top-6-million-city-keeps-2-6-million/
I presumed the Woodland School project in that list was related to the exterior and foundation work completed at the elementary school in the past few years.
If I recall correctly, the revenues initially went into the general fund and might have been used to help with issues related to an accounting standards change and property tax collections. Starting in Fiscal Year 2011, they were deposited into a special fund that has been used to pay for pedestrian safety projects. That fund now has a cash balance of $778,305.
WK Hyatt says
School zones only, and a better split for the City
Harry Pruitt says
Well of course RedFlex is ready to discuss options. After fleecing Oak Ridge for years they realize that their time is coming to an end. Come on Baughn, Garland, Hope and Moseby, throw the bums out. Terminate the contract and return Oak Ridge to the citizen friendly village it once was.
Jeanne Hicks Powers says
I’ve been resigned to them so far but making them mobile is just too much! If they do go mobile, I hope they give plenty of warning! Enough is enough… Do we want to be known as “The Secret City… of Speed Traps”?
Kelvin Rice says
Redflex is over !!!!!!