• About
    • About Us
    • What We Cover
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Our Advertisers
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Send News
  • Subscribe

Oak Ridge Today

  • Home
  • Sign in
  • News
    • Business
    • Community
    • Education
    • Government
    • Health
    • Police and Fire
    • U.S. Department of Energy
    • Weather
  • Sports
    • High School
    • Middle School
    • Recreation
    • Rowing
    • Youth
  • Entertainment
    • Arts
    • Dancing
    • Movies
    • Music
    • Television
    • Theater
  • Premium Content
  • Obituaries
  • Classifieds

 

Peace group wants fence removed from longtime Y-12 protest area

Posted at 1:48 pm July 13, 2013
By John Huotari 7 Comments

Y-12 Fence on Scarboro Road

The temporary fence erected at the main entrance to the Y-12 National Security Complex encloses an area, pictured above, that has been used for protests and vigils for years. An Oak Ridge organization that wants to eradicate nuclear weapons has asked a federal court to order the removal of the fence before an Aug. 6 ceremony.

Calling it an assault on their First Amendment rights, an Oak Ridge organization has again asked a federal court to order officials to remove a fence that blocks an area long used for protests, vigils, and demonstrations in front of the Y-12 National Security Complex.

The Oak Ridge Environmental Peace Alliance, which opposes Y-12’s nuclear weapons production work, filed the preliminary injunction in U.S. District Court in Knoxville on Friday. The lawsuit, which amends a complaint filed in April, names new U.S. Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz as the sole defendant.

OREPA wants the U.S. Department of Energy to reopen a small grass field near Y-12’s main entrance at East Bear Creek and Scarboro roads before an annual Aug. 6 demonstration. If it is left in place, the temporary fence erected April 1 would cause “irreparable harm” to First Amendment rights—including the rights of free speech, peaceful assembly, and the ability to petition the government for a redress of grievances, OREPA said.

The National Nuclear Security Administration announced plans to erect the fence in March. A separate DOE agency, the NNSA said it was responding to three trespassing incidents involving five people at Y-12 in the past year, including the July 28 security breach. The temporary fence was erected in early April.

Ralph Hutchison

Ralph Hutchison

But OREPA alleges the fence, which runs from Bear Creek Road to New Hope Road and encloses the New Hope Center, was meant to prevent members of its nonprofit organization from gathering in their traditional protest spot near the large, green billboard-like Y-12 sign on Scarboro Road.

“The National Nuclear Security Administration launched a brazen assault on our First Amendment right to free speech and free assembly,” OREPA coordinator Ralph Hutchison said in a press release this week. “We believe the First Amendment is more powerful than NNSA’s bogus security claim, and we expect the courts to grant the relief we seek.”

OREPA wants the fence removed before the annual Aug. 6 demonstration to allow for the Names and Remembrance Ceremony, which commemorates the anniversary of the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima, Japan, in 1945, near the end of World War II. Uranium enriched at Y-12 was used in that bomb, called “Little Boy.”

“It is important to bear witness here, in the place that gave birth to the bomb, to call the world to remember, to join our voices with the survivors of the bombings to say, ‘Never Again,’” Hutchison said. “No other place on earth has the same moment as this place, the front door of the bomb plant.”

A July 24 court hearing has been requested, and it could be held in Chattanooga, OREPA said.

The federal lawsuit has 21 plaintiffs, including the entire OREPA board of directors. OREPA is represented by Knoxville attorneys Francis Lloyd and John Eldridge.

OREPA said its members and others have used the Y-12 protest area for nuclear disarmament demonstrations, weekly Sunday vigils, peace rallies, and public education events in more than 700 gatherings during the past 25 years.

“Never once has an event been marred by any act of violence perpetrated by a member of OREPA,” the lawsuit said.

The NNSA has said OREPA could apply to use the publicly accessible New Hope Center for its vigils and demonstrations, but in response, OREPA has said that space is less visible, and it would require the group to request permission, pay fees, and secure insurance.

In its original complaint, filed in April, OREPA asked the U.S. District Court to order that the new temporary fence be removed before an annual spring demonstration.

But District Judge Curtis L. Collier questioned whether the court had jurisdiction to address the complaint filed by OREPA, its board members, and people affiliated with the organization. He gave the plaintiffs two weeks to explain why the federal court had jurisdiction or why the complaint should be amended.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Suzanne H. Bauknight and U.S. Attorney William C. Killian said then that the federal government has the right to close a previously open public forum such as the protest area at Y-12. They said the First Amendment does not guarantee access to property simply because it is owned or controlled by the government.

The NNSA has said the new fence—plans have called for installing a permanent fence later at a cost of about $150,000—is not designed to keep people from crossing it, but it will let them know they should not go any farther. Those who cross it will be subject to state and federal charges.

But OREPA said the previous three-strand barbed wire fence, set back farther from Scarboro Road than the new fence, was already half a mile or more from the weapon production facilities at Y-12, and no security threat has ever been launched from there. OREPA has suggested the NNSA replace the older three-strand barbed wire fence with a eight-foot-high chain link fence.

In April, Chuck Spencer, president and general manager of B&W Y-12, the plant’s managing and operating contractor, said officials stand behind the new fence as one of several necessary security improvements at Y-12.

“While past decisions to allow demonstrations in this area may have been sound at the time, the fact is that we are now a more frequent target of intentional and illegal trespassing than ever before,” Spencer said. “We fully expect that others will test our security systems, so we will work to continuously improve them.”

Filed Under: Federal, Government, National Nuclear Security Administration, Top Stories, U.S. Department of Energy, Y-12 National Security Complex, Y-12 Security Breach Tagged With: complaint, Curtis L. Collier, demonstration, DOE, Ernest Moniz, First Amendment, Francis Lloyd, free speech, Hiroshima, John Eldridge, lawsuit, Little Boy, National Nuclear Security Administration, New Hope Center, NNSA, nuclear disarmament, nuclear weapons, Oak Ridge Environmental Peace Alliance, OREPA, peace, peaceful assembly, protest, public forum, Ralph Hutchison, redress of grievances, Scarboro Road, security breach, Suzanne H. Bauknight, trespassing, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. District Court, vigils, William C. Killian, World War II, Y-12 National Security Complex

Advertisements

 


Join the club!

If you appreciate our work, please consider subscribing. Besides helping us, your subscription will give you access to our premium content.

Some of our stories are free, brought to you by Oak Ridge Today with help from our members—advertisers, subscribers, and sponsors.

But some are premium content, available only to members. Those are in-depth, investigative, or exclusive stories that are available only on Oak Ridge Today. They generally require significant time to report, write, and publish.

You can subscribe for as little as $5 per month.

You can read more about your options here.

We currently offer five primary subscription options to readers, and they include benefits.

Basic

  • Basic monthly subscription ($5 per month)—access premium content
  • Basic annual subscription ($60 per year)—access premium content

Pro

  • Pro monthly subscription ($10 per month)—access premium content, get breaking news emails first, and submit one press release or public service announcement per month
  • Pro annual subscription ($100 per year)—save $20 per year, access premium content, get breaking news emails first, and submit one press release or public service announcement per month

Temporary

  • Temporary access ($3 per week for two weeks)

We also have advanced subscription options. You can see them here.

We also accept donations. You can donate here.

If you prefer to send a check for a subscription or donation, you may do so by mailing one to:

Oak Ridge Today
P.O. Box 6064
Oak Ridge, TN 37831

Thank you for your consideration and for reading Oak Ridge Today. We appreciate your support.

Commenting Guidelines

We welcome comments, but we ask you to follow a few guidelines:

1) Please use your real name, including last name. Please also use a valid e-mail address.
2) Be civil. Don't insult others, attack their character, or get personal.
3) Stick to the issues.
4) No profanity.
5) Keep your comments to a reasonable length and to a reasonable number per article.

We reserve the right to remove any comments that violate these guidelines. Comments held for review, usually from those posting for the first time, may not post if they violate these guidelines. Thank you for your patience and understanding. Thank you also for reading Oak Ridge Today and for participating in the discussion.

More information is available here.

Comments

  1. Jason Allison says

    July 13, 2013 at 2:07 pm

    The fence isn’t going anywhere. That has always been government property (well since the 40s) and they CAN do with it what they choose.

    Reply
    • Sam Hopwood says

      July 14, 2013 at 7:47 am

      Maybe, maybe not. Public safety is a factor here.

      Reply
      • Jason Allison says

        July 14, 2013 at 1:33 pm

        It’s only a safety issue because the protesters chose to make it one. they were given an alternative and they chose to decline the offer. Mrs. Smith does have a valid point. The location of the temporary fence is too close to the road. DOE can opt to close Scarboro to thru traffic just as they did on Bethel Valley, that would end any confusion (not that I want them to do it however)

        Reply
  2. Ellen Smith says

    July 13, 2013 at 2:19 pm

    It’s not at all clear to me that the First Amendment gives people an absolute right to choose where they assemble for a protest.

    I have, however, been concerned about the effect of this new fence on safety. It is at the edge of the pavement next to the right lane of the road, leaving no shoulder. It seems to me that this is a hazardous condition for a vehicle that goes off the road. It’s even more clear that it makes it impossible for any pedestrian to walk on the side of the road and it increases the hazards for bicyclists.

    Reply
    • johnhuotari says

      July 13, 2013 at 3:49 pm

      I have heard this concern from other people as well, that the temporary fence is too close to the road. I haven’t asked how close to the road the permanent fence will be, but I’ll try to check into that.

      Reply
      • Ellen Smith says

        July 13, 2013 at 6:17 pm

        Someone on city staff who is knowledgable of the situation (I’m not being cagey; I just don’t remember which staff member it was) told me that the road right-of-way ends at the edge of the pavement. That indicates that DOE/NNSA have the legal right to put a fence there.

        However, if the fence is built that close to the road, I predict that the speed limit will soon have to be reduced to something like 20 mph in that stretch. That will only add to the traffic congestion issues that sometimes occur there. For example, it will slow the commute to work for many people who live in Oak Ridge and work at ORNL.

        Reply
    • Sam Hopwood says

      July 13, 2013 at 4:20 pm

      This is just the government playing games because they (we) were so terribly embarrassed by the security episodes. Kinda’ like kids hitting back. But you are certainly correct that the temporary fence is a hazard for just about everyone. Lack of common sense for sure.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More Government News

Residents discuss Dollar General in Marlow

A handful of Anderson County residents have expressed mixed opinions in government meetings about a reported proposal to build a Dollar General store next to Oliver Springs Highway in Marlow, but the Anderson County … [Read More...]

Read city manager’s retirement letter

This is a copy of the January 17 retirement letter from Oak Ridge City Manager Mark Watson to the seven Oak Ridge City Council members. Since August of 2010, I have been proud to serve the City of Oak Ridge as its … [Read More...]

Oak Ridge Public Library

Library restrooms will be renovated

The restrooms at the Oak Ridge Public Library will be renovated starting February 1. The renovations are expected to be completed by June 1. The renovations will result in increased accessibility under Americans … [Read More...]

Breakfast with Legislators resumes Monday

Breakfast with the Legislators begins this year on Monday. The monthly breakfasts are scheduled each year while the Tennessee General Assembly is in session. They are hosted by the League of Women Voters of Oak Ridge, … [Read More...]

Former AC Commissioner Hitchcock dies

Note: This story was updated at 11:30 a.m. Harry "Whitey" Hitchcock, who represented part of Oak Ridge in three terms on Anderson County Commission, died January 10. A former teacher, he was 76. Hitchcock served on … [Read More...]

More Government

More U.S. Department of Energy News

UPF construction could cost more, take longer

The Uranium Processing Facility at Y-12 National Security Complex was supposed to be completed by 2025 for no more than $6.5 billion, but that might no longer be the case. In the past week, federal officials said … [Read More...]

Y-12 celebrates new fire station, emergency operations center

A new fire station and emergency operations center at the Y-12 National Security Complex will replace "severely outdated" buildings that were constructed in the 1940s, about eight decades ago. The new buildings will … [Read More...]

Oak Ridge EM prepared for cold weather to prevent failures

From DOE Office of Environmental Management’s "EM Update" newsletter UCOR employees Andy Rodgers, left, and Alex Johnson install heat tracing to protect systems at the Environmental Management Waste Management … [Read More...]

Extreme Classroom Makeover applications due Jan. 31

The deadline to submit a video application is about one week away in a contest that awards $25,000 to improve STEM education in public schools in the region. ORAU's Extreme Classroom Makeover is open to third-grade to … [Read More...]

You may hear Y-12 sirens when maintenance performed

There will be maintenance work on the public warning siren system in Oak Ridge during the week of January 23, and people in the area might occasionally hear audio from individual sirens around the Y-12 National Security … [Read More...]

More DOE

Recent Posts

  • Speakers mostly support TRISO-X fuel facility at meeting
  • UPF construction could cost more, take longer
  • Y-12 celebrates new fire station, emergency operations center
  • One person seriously injured in Wednesday crash
  • Oak Ridge EM prepared for cold weather to prevent failures
  • Covenant Health donating land for Roane State health science center
  • School board approves aviation career path
  • Wildcats name new football coach
  • Free dental, vision, medical services in February
  • Junior Playhouse performs ‘Gingerbread: Hansel & Gretel’ in February

Search Oak Ridge Today

About Us

About Oak Ridge Today
What We Cover

How To

Advertise
Subscribe

Contact Us

Contact Oak Ridge Today

Copyright © 2023 Oak Ridge Today