• About
    • About Us
    • What We Cover
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Our Advertisers
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Send News

Oak Ridge Today

  • Home
  • Sign in
  • News
    • Business
    • Community
    • Education
    • Government
    • Health
    • Police and Fire
    • U.S. Department of Energy
    • Weather
  • Sports
    • High School
    • Middle School
    • Recreation
    • Rowing
    • Youth
  • Entertainment
    • Arts
    • Dancing
    • Movies
    • Music
    • Television
    • Theater
  • Premium Content
  • Obituaries
  • Classifieds

B&W-led team files new protest over Y-12, Pantex contract

Posted at 7:15 pm June 17, 2013
By John Huotari 3 Comments

Y-12 National Security Complex

Y-12 National Security Complex (Submitted photo)

The Babcock and Wilcox Company announced Monday that Nuclear Production Partners LLC, or NP2, has filed a new protest with the Government Accountability Office related to the combined management and operating contract at the Y-12 National Security Complex in Oak Ridge and Pantex Plant near Amarillo, Texas.

“NP2 has expressed concern over the fairness of the procurement and selection process and the form and scope of the revised request for proposals issued to bidders on June 6,” a press release said.

“B&W and our NP2 team have expressed a number of ongoing concerns related to this procurement process,” said George Dudich, president of Babcock and Wilcox Technical Services Group Inc. “We are asking the Government Accountability Office to examine the fairness of the revised request for proposals and to ensure the RFP meets all government contracting requirements and fully addresses the GAO’s original decision and recommendation outlined on April 29, 2013, when our original protest was sustained.”

The National Nuclear Security Administration announced in May that it would request more information from the three teams that had submitted bids on the consolidated contract to manage and operate Y-12 and Pantex. That announcement came after the GAO announced at the end of April that it had partially upheld protests filed by NP2, of Lynchburg, Va., and Integrated Nuclear Production Solutions LLC, of Oak Ridge, raising questions about the proposed savings. The GAO recommended that the procurement be re-opened, more information requested from the bidders about their proposed cost savings, and the relative size of each team’s proposed cost savings evaluated.

In January, the NNSA announced it had awarded a contract valued at about $23 billion to Consolidated Nuclear Security LLC, or CNS, to manage and operate Y-12 and Pantex. The two losing teams, NP2 and Integrated Nuclear Production Solutions LLC, filed protests later that month.

Babcock and Wilcox is the current lead managing and operating contractor at Y-12 and Pantex. Also part of the NP2 team are URS, Northrop Grumman, and Honeywell.

The Integrated Nuclear Production Solutions team includes Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. and Fluor Federal Services Inc.

More information will be added as it becomes available.

Note: This story was updated at 7:37 p.m.

Filed Under: Anderson County, Business, Federal, Government, National Nuclear Security Administration, Top Stories, Y-12 National Security Complex Tagged With: Amarillo, B&W, Babcock and Wilcox Company, Babcock and Wilcox Technical Services Group Inc., CNS, Consolidated Nuclear Security LLC, GAO, George Dudich, Government Accountability Office, Integrated Nuclear Production Solutions LLC, National Nuclear Security Administration, NNSA, NP2, Nuclear Production Partners LLC, Oak Ridge, Pantex Plant, procurement, request for proposals, RFP, Y-12 National Security Complex

Comments

  1. Angi Agle says

    June 18, 2013 at 2:51 pm

    Well, I guess as long as protests are filed and active, we don’t have to deal with the trauma of combining contracts for two plants more than a thousand miles apart.

    Reply
    • johnhuotari says

      June 18, 2013 at 4:59 pm

      I tried to get information today from the NNSA on how long this process might take, but they declined to comment.

      Reply
    • johnhuotari says

      June 23, 2013 at 3:09 pm

      Angi, I posted a newer story that says the GAO has until Sept. 25 to rule on this new protest. Here’s the link: http://bjq.6af.mytemp.website/2013/06/20/decision-on-new-protest-of-y-12-pantex-contract-due-sept-25/

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Anderson County Chamber Headquarters Dedication Set for October 17
  • ORISE announces winners of 2025 Future of Science Awards
  • SL Tennessee Supports New Anderson County Chamber Headquarters
  • ORAU 2025 Pollard Scholarship recipients announced
  • Democratic Womens Club Hosts State Rep. Sam McKenzie
  • Flatwater Tales Storytelling Festival Announces 2025 Storytellers
  • Laser-Engraved Bricks Will Line Walkway of New Chamber Headquarters
  • Democratic Womens Club to Discuss Climate Change, Energy and Policy
  • Estate Jewelry Show at Karens Jewelers Features Celebrity Jewelry
  • Keri Cagle named new ORAU senior vice president and ORISE director

Search Oak Ridge Today

Copyright © 2025 Oak Ridge Today