• About
    • About Us
    • What We Cover
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Our Advertisers
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Send News
  • Subscribe

Oak Ridge Today

  • Home
  • Sign in
  • News
    • Business
    • Community
    • Education
    • Government
    • Health
    • Police and Fire
    • U.S. Department of Energy
    • Weather
  • Sports
    • High School
    • Middle School
    • Recreation
    • Rowing
    • Youth
  • Entertainment
    • Arts
    • Dancing
    • Movies
    • Music
    • Television
    • Theater
  • Premium Content
  • Obituaries
  • Classifieds

 

Y-12 fence that blocks protest area to remain up for now; judge questions lawsuit jurisdiction

Posted at 5:51 pm April 5, 2013
By John Huotari 8 Comments

Y-12 Fence on Scarboro Road

The temporary fence erected at the main entrance to the Y-12 National Security Complex encloses an area, pictured above, that has been used for protests and vigils for years. Despite a court challenge Friday, the fence will stay up for now.

KNOXVILLE—The temporary fence that blocks a traditional protest area at the Y-12 National Security Complex will stay up for now.

A group that has used the grass field and small parking lot for protests and vigils near the Y-12 entrance at Bear Creek and Scarboro roads had sought to have the fence removed before an annual spring demonstration on Saturday. Workers started erecting it on Monday.

But the arguments about the fence and its alleged violations of the protesters’ First Amendment rights took a surprise turn in U.S. District Court in Knoxville on Friday.

District Judge Curtis L. Collier quickly raised a question about whether the court has jurisdiction to address the complaint filed Wednesday by the Oak Ridge Environmental Peace Alliance, its board members, and people affiliated with the nonprofit organization.

Collier’s questions about jurisdiction appeared to catch attorneys by surprise. They had apparently focused on First Amendment issues and the request to remove the fence, and not on jurisdiction.

“Your honor, I didn’t know that was going to be an issue,” said John E. Eldridge, one of two attorneys for the 23 plaintiffs.

Collier acknowledged that the OREPA complaint took a lot of work to prepare, but it focused on the “big picture.” Jurisdiction must be pleaded and proven in every case, he said.

At one point, Assistant U.S. Attorney Suzanne H. Bauknight asked the court to dismiss the OREPA complaint, but Collier instead gave the plaintiffs two weeks to explain why the federal court has jurisdiction or why the complaint should be amended.

“We’ll find that jurisdiction,” Eldridge responded.

OREPA and its representatives said they were disappointed.

“We never got to address the issue that we came here for, which was the fencing out of First Amendment rights,” Eldridge said.

The National Nuclear Security Administration announced plans to erect the fence last week. A separate agency within the U.S. Department of Energy, the NNSA said it was responding to three trespassing incidents involving five people at Y-12 in the past year, including the July 28 security breach.

Francis L. Lloyd Jr., the other attorney for the plaintiffs, said the fence is an “outright deprivation” of constitutional rights, and injunctive relief would be appropriate. That relief would have required the fence to be removed.

However, Collier denied the request, meaning the fence can stay in place for now.

Bauknight and U.S. Attorney William C. Killian have said the federal government has the right to close a previously open public forum such as the protest area at Y-12. They said the First Amendment does not guarantee access to property simply because it is owned or controlled by the government.

OREPA opposes Y-12’s nuclear weapons work. The group said the small area that is now enclosed by the fence at Y-12’s main entrance has been used for about 700 gatherings during the past 25 years. They said the fence violates First Amendment rights to freedom of speech, the right to assemble, and the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Ralph Hutchison

Ralph Hutchison

OREPA Coordinator Ralph Hutchison said the group still plans to have its annual spring demonstration, which starts at 12:30 p.m. Saturday at the Friendship Bell at A.K. Bissell Park. It ends with a walk down South Illinois Avenue to Y-12, where protesters plan to tie signs and peace cranes on the new fence, Hutchison said.

Friday’s court hearing forced organizers to change the time and location of some events, and most activities will take place at A.K. Bissell Park this year, Hutchison said.

He said he would still like to see the fence removed.

“We all win if they take the fence down,” Hutchison said. “Everyone’s rights are at risk if anyone’s rights are taken away.”

Note: This story was updated at 11:35 a.m. April 6.

Filed Under: Federal, Government, National Nuclear Security Administration, Top Stories, U.S. Department of Energy, Y-12 National Security Complex Tagged With: Curtis L. Collier, fence, First Amendment, Francis L. Lloyd Jr., John E. Eldridge, National Nuclear Security Administration, NNSA, Oak Ridge Environmental Peace Alliance, OREPA, protests, Ralph Hutchison, Suzanne H. Bauknight, trespassing, U.S. Attorney, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. District Court, William C. Killian, Y-12 National Security Complex

Advertisements

 



Join the club!

If you appreciate our work, please consider subscribing. Besides helping us, your subscription will give you access to our premium content.

Some of our stories are free, brought to you by Oak Ridge Today with help from our members—advertisers, subscribers, and sponsors.

But some are premium content, available only to members. Those are in-depth, investigative, or exclusive stories that are available only on Oak Ridge Today. They generally require significant time to report, write, and publish.

You can subscribe for as little as $5 per month.

You can read more about your options here.

We currently offer five primary subscription options to readers, and they include benefits.

Basic

  • Basic monthly subscription ($5 per month)—access premium content
  • Basic annual subscription ($60 per year)—access premium content

Pro

  • Pro monthly subscription ($10 per month)—access premium content, get breaking news emails first, and submit one press release or public service announcement per month
  • Pro annual subscription ($100 per year)—save $20 per year, access premium content, get breaking news emails first, and submit one press release or public service announcement per month

Temporary

  • Temporary access ($3 per week for two weeks)

We also have advanced subscription options. You can see them here.

We also accept donations. You can donate here.

If you prefer to send a check for a subscription or donation, you may do so by mailing one to:

Oak Ridge Today
P.O. Box 6064
Oak Ridge, TN 37831

Thank you for your consideration and for reading Oak Ridge Today. We appreciate your support.

Commenting Guidelines

We welcome comments, but we ask you to follow a few guidelines:

1) Please use your real name, including last name. Please also use a valid e-mail address.
2) Be civil. Don't insult others, attack their character, or get personal.
3) Stick to the issues.
4) No profanity.
5) Keep your comments to a reasonable length and to a reasonable number per article.

We reserve the right to remove any comments that violate these guidelines. Comments held for review, usually from those posting for the first time, may not post if they violate these guidelines. Thank you for your patience and understanding. Thank you also for reading Oak Ridge Today and for participating in the discussion.

More information is available here.

Comments

  1. Jason Allison says

    April 5, 2013 at 6:42 pm

    OREPA…..There is room across the street for you to protest, they didn’t fence that off

    Reply
    • Peter Scheffler says

      April 6, 2013 at 12:17 am

      Jason, what area do you mean? And speaking of that, John Huotari, what happened to the aerial photo in an earlier story showing the location of the new fence, the old demonstration area, and the new demonstration area?

      Reply
      • Jason Allison says

        April 6, 2013 at 5:49 am

        If you go to the Y12 site, you will see that there is land not fenced off. May I add, I didn’t see at first the comment that the group was offered an alternate place to gather. Why did they turn that down? Seems to me they kind of sealed their fate when they turned that down. I think the judge nailed it on the head.

        “Federal attorneys said the fence, which will be replaced by a permanent fence later, “simply precludes unauthorized public access to a facility that continues to play a pivotal role in maintaining the U.S. nuclear weapons stockpile.”

        This was taken from a newer story on here titled
        “Government can close area previously used for Y-12 protests, U.S. attorneys say”

        My suggestion doesn’t give much room but the group doesn’t have to sit in each others laps to voice their opinions.

        Reply
      • Jason Allison says

        April 6, 2013 at 5:52 am

        The story in which had the overhead shot was

        “Government should remove fence around Y-12 protest area by Saturday, group says in federal lawsuit”

        The photo is still posted.

        Reply
      • johnhuotari says

        April 6, 2013 at 11:53 am

        Peter, I’m not sure what happened to the image, but I added it again. It’s possible there was a problem caused by a technical issue with a caching plugin. That issue should be resolved now.

        Reply
  2. Jimmy Johnson says

    April 5, 2013 at 10:45 pm

    If Japan hadn’t bombed Pearl Harbor the US would not had bombed Japan. Even after 70 years the protesters still can’t understand concept.

    Reply
  3. Jason Allison says

    April 6, 2013 at 5:58 am

    sorry, if I may add one more thing. I think, maybe, the security force and Y12 should clear some of the trees directly across from the main entrace. If you look at the aerial photo you will see a small clearing directly behind a row of trees. Too me that would be acceptable. They could even go as far as erecting some form cover structure. Now this probably isn’t DOE property but it isn’t a currently utilized piece of land and I’m pretty sure DOE isn’t so strapped for cash that they couldn’t purchase that land.

    Reply
  4. Peter Scheffler says

    April 7, 2013 at 12:44 am

    Thanks to Jason and John for helping me on the picture and Jason for the details on the other possible area.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More Government News

Anderson County Courthouse

Anderson County government offices closed Monday, Tuesday

Anderson County government offices will be closed Monday and Tuesday, July 3-4, to observe Independence Day. The offices will re-open at 8 a.m. Wednesday morning, July 5, a press release said. The Anderson County … [Read More...]

Fireworks show, music on July 4

Oak Ridge's annual fireworks show is scheduled to being at dark Tuesday, around 9:45 p.m. on Independence Day, July 4. There will be music before the show. The celebration, which is sponsored by the City of Oak Ridge, … [Read More...]

Library announces check-out changes

Ten days after celebrating renovations, the Oak Ridge Public Library has announced changes to its check-out procedures and policies that take effect on Saturday, July 1. Among the changes: The City of Oak Ridge … [Read More...]

USA Cycling Time Trial National Championships on Thursday

Oak Ridge Traffic Impacts Oak Ridge will host its fifth annual USA Cycling Individual Time Trial National Championships on Thursday, June 22. Elite cyclists nationwide will converge on the city, showcasing their skill … [Read More...]

Oak Ridgers celebrate library renovations

A standing-room-only crowd attended the grand re-opening celebration of renovations to the East Wing of the Oak Ridge Public Library on Tuesday. The renovations include a brand-new Children’s Room and bathrooms that … [Read More...]

More Government

More U.S. Department of Energy News

SNS on hiatus for upgrade

The Spallation Neutron Source at Oak Ridge National Laboratory—already the world’s most powerful accelerator-based neutron source—will be on a planned hiatus through June 2024 as crews work to upgrade the … [Read More...]

Sholl named interim executive director of UT-Oak Ridge Innovation Institute

David Sholl, director of the Transformational Decarbonization Initiative at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, has been appointed interim executive director of the University of Tennessee-Oak Ridge Innovation Institute. His … [Read More...]

ORNL scientist to lead project studying permafrost thaw, climate processes in Alaska

Submitted Colleen Iversen—ecosystem ecologist, group leader, and distinguished staff scientist at Oak Ridge National Laboratory—has been named director of the U.S. Department of Energy’s Next-Generation Ecosystem … [Read More...]

DOE asks for public comment about ETTP groundwater decision

The U.S. Department of Energy has asked for public comment about a proposed plan to reduce groundwater contamination in the main plant area of East Tennessee Technology Park, the former K-25 site in west Oak … [Read More...]

Ken Tarcza joins ORAU as chief of staff

Ken Tarcza has joined Oak Ridge Associated Universities as chief of staff. Tarcza comes to ORAU after an impressive military and federal career, a press release said. A graduate of West Point, Tarcza spent his military … [Read More...]

More DOE

Recent Posts

  • ORPD investigating fatal crash on South Illinois
  • SNS on hiatus for upgrade
  • County sees increase in infant deaths due to unsafe sleeping practices
  • ASAP of Anderson welcomes new executive director
  • Briceville Fire Department celebrates new station
  • Officers searching for suspect in fatal shooting
  • Oak Ridge to host movie premiere of ‘Oppenheimer’
  • Oak Ridge Schools to host panel discussion, documentary screening for ‘Oppenheimer’
  • Sam Bush to headline Summer Sessions concert
  • Anderson County government offices closed Monday, Tuesday

Search Oak Ridge Today

About Us

About Oak Ridge Today
What We Cover

How To

Advertise
Subscribe

Contact Us

Contact Oak Ridge Today

Copyright © 2023 Oak Ridge Today