• About
    • About Us
    • What We Cover
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Our Advertisers
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Send News
  • Subscribe

Oak Ridge Today

  • Home
  • Sign in
  • News
    • Business
    • Community
    • Education
    • Government
    • Health
    • Police and Fire
    • U.S. Department of Energy
    • Weather
  • Sports
    • High School
    • Middle School
    • Recreation
    • Rowing
    • Youth
  • Entertainment
    • Arts
    • Dancing
    • Movies
    • Music
    • Television
    • Theater
  • Premium Content
  • Obituaries
  • Classifieds




Y-12 protesters ask court to dismiss sabotage charges

Posted at 1:46 pm January 22, 2013
By John Huotari Leave a Comment

Transform Now Plowshares

The three anti-nuclear weapons activists pictured above allegedly cut through fences and vandalized a high-security building at the Y-12 National Security Complex in July and now face federal charges of property destruction, property depredation, and injuring national defense premises. From left to right the three are Michael R. Walli, Megan Rice, and Greg Boertje-Obed. (Submitted photo)

In one of a series of motions last week, the three protesters who broke into the Y-12 National Security Complex on July 28 asked a federal court to dismiss the new sabotage charges filed against them in December.

Attorneys for the protesters—anti-nuclear weapons activists Greg Boertje-Obed, Megan Rice, and Michael R. Walli—said the new charges, which could add up to 20 years in prison, are unconstitutional, vindictive, and selective. They said the new charges were brought because the defendants earlier refused to plead guilty to less serious crimes.

In addition, the sabotage charges are rarely applied to civilian conduct and should not have been used in this case because Y-12 is a private contractor site and not a military base, the four attorneys for the protesters said in a motion to dismiss filed in U.S. District Court in Knoxville on Friday.

Boertje-Obed, Rice, and Walli are accused of sneaking into Y-12 before dawn on July 28, cutting through fences in the high-security Protected Area, and splashing human blood and spray-painting slogans on the Highly Enriched Uranium Materials Facility, where the nation’s primary supply of bomb-grade uranium is stored.

In August, the trio was charged with property depredation, trespassing, and attempting to injure federal property. Those charges carried possible prison sentences of up to 16 years in prison.

The new charges, which do not include the previous trespassing charges, carry total prison sentences of up to 35 years.

The defendants’ attorneys said federal prosecutors tried to persuade the defendants to plead guilty to two of the three charges filed in August and threatened to bring the more serious sabotage charges. The defendants’ attorneys are William P. Quigley of New Orleans, Chris Irwin and Francis L. Lloyd Jr. of Knoxville, and Boertje-Obed of Duluth, Minn., who is representing himself.

“Despite such threats, defendants elected to plead not guilty and to exercise their Sixth Amendment right to a trial before a jury of their peers,” the attorneys said. “Consequently, on Dec. 4, 2012, as retaliation against defendants for exercising their constitutional right to a trial, the prosecution charged defendants with the additional more serious crime of sabotage.”

The attorneys said the new charges violated the defendants’ due process rights and were unconstitutional.

“Though plea bargaining clearly is the bedrock upon which the current criminal law system is built, adding extra charges to try to force a plea does not make it just,” the attorneys said.

The attorneys also said the nuclear sabotage charge has only been applied in a handful of cases in the past 73 years to civilians who are involved in nonviolent civil disobedience and cause damage to government property.

“The statute is overwhelmingly applied to military personnel, not civilians engaged in nonviolent and symbolic civil disobedience,” the defense team said.

The attorneys said the prosecution’s decision to recharge the defendants with national defense sabotage was “selective and wrongful prosecution.”

The defendants also reasserted an argument they have made previously, one that appears to have been largely dismissed by U.S. Magistrate Judge C. Clifford Shirley Jr. in a Jan. 2 report and recommendation.

“The use and threat of use of the nuclear weapons of mass destruction that are being made and refurbished at Y-12 are unlawful and criminal under U.S. law as they constitute genocide and the commission of a war crime,” the defendants’ motion to dismiss said. “Furthermore, U.S. international law and the laws of war prohibit the use of these weapons of mass destruction being produced and processed at Y-12. Thus, due to the ongoing illegality of the activities going on at Y-12 under both U.S. and international law, defendants’ actions in nonviolently exposing and protesting the use of these weapons was reasonable and justified.”

Shirley said the production, processing, and storage of nuclear weapons at Y-12 does not constitute a war crime, and the production, processing, and storage of nuclear weapons does not violate international law.

Filed Under: Special Sections, Top Stories, U.S. Department of Energy, Y-12 National Security Complex, Y-12 Security Breach Tagged With: anti-nuclear weapons activists, attempting to injure federal property, C. Clifford Shirley Jr., Chris Irwin, Francis L. Lloyd Jr., Greg Boertje-Obed, Highly Enriched Uranium Materials Facility, Megan Rice, Michael R. Walli, property depredation, sabotage, trespassing, U.S. District Court, William P. Quigley, Y-12 National Security Complex, Y-12 protesters

Advertisements

 

Join the club!

If you appreciate our work, please consider subscribing. Besides helping us, your subscription will give you access to our premium content.

Most of our stories are free, brought to you by Oak Ridge Today with help from our members—advertisers, subscribers, and sponsors.

But some are premium content, available only to members. Those are in-depth, investigative, or exclusive stories that are available only on Oak Ridge Today. They generally require at least four hours to report, write, and publish.

You can subscribe for as little as $5 per month.

You can read more about your options here.

We currently offer five primary subscription options to readers, and they include benefits.

Basic

  • Basic monthly subscription ($5 per month)—access premium content
  • Basic annual subscription ($60 per year)—access premium content

Pro

  • Pro monthly subscription ($10 per month)—access premium content, get breaking news emails first, and submit one press release or public service announcement per month
  • Pro annual subscription ($100 per year)—save $20 per year, access premium content, get breaking news emails first, and submit one press release or public service announcement per month

Temporary

  • Temporary access ($3 per week for two weeks)

We also have advanced subscription options. You can see them here.

We also accept donations. You can donate here.

If you prefer to send a check for a subscription or donation, you may do so by mailing one to:

Oak Ridge Today
P.O. Box 6064
Oak Ridge, TN 37831

Thank you for your consideration and for reading Oak Ridge Today. We appreciate your support.

Commenting Guidelines

We welcome comments, but we ask you to follow a few guidelines:

1) Please use your real name, including last name. Please also use a valid e-mail address.
2) Be civil. Don't insult others, attack their character, or get personal.
3) Stick to the issues.
4) No profanity.
5) Keep your comments to a reasonable length and to a reasonable number per article.

We reserve the right to remove any comments that violate these guidelines. Comments held for review, usually from those posting for the first time, may not post if they violate these guidelines. Thank you for your patience and understanding. Thank you also for reading Oak Ridge Today and for participating in the discussion.

More information is available here.

More U.S. Department of Energy News

NNSA has virtual job fair, including for Y-12

The sign at the main entrance to the Y-12 National Security Complex is pictured above on Sunday, Aug. 6, 2017. (File photo by John Huotari/Oak Ridge Today) The U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security … [Read More...]

DOE photographer dies at 62

Lynn Freeny (Photo courtesy U.S. Department of Energy) Ross Lynn Freeny, a U.S. Department of Energy photographer who helped document current and historic activities in Oak Ridge, died on January 14. He was … [Read More...]

Protesters will say nuclear weapons illegal under UN treaty

Members of Oak Ridge Environmental Peace Alliance and supporters gather across from the Y-12 National Security Complex to protest the plant's Uranium Processing Facility in April 2013. (File photo) Protesters plan to … [Read More...]

U.S. Department of Energy Logo

Controlled burns start this week on DOE land

The U.S. Department of Energy is starting a series of controlled burns of grassland areas on the Oak Ridge Reservation this week. The controlled burns could continue through mid-April, depending upon weather. The … [Read More...]

Mason, an IDB member, community volunteer, dies of COVID complications

David Mason David Lane Mason, a member of the Oak Ridge Industrial Development Board and community volunteer, died of COVID-19 complications on Monday. He was 79. Mason was a former deputy director of environmental … [Read More...]

More DOE

Recent Posts

  • NNSA has virtual job fair, including for Y-12
  • Tower rebuilding complete, South Illinois re-opened overnight
  • DOE photographer dies at 62
  • South Illinois Avenue to re-open by midnight
  • AC Democratic Women to hear about income inequality Monday
  • Photos: TVA transmission tower repair
  • South Illinois could re-open Monday
  • Crews repairing damage after crash knocks down power tower
  • Part of South Illinois Ave. remains closed
  • Power restored to Oak Ridge except for Arboretum

Recent Comments

  • Matt Bailey on Dodson also wants to serve as mayor pro tem
  • Mark Caldwell on Dodson also wants to serve as mayor pro tem
  • Matt Bailey on Dodson also wants to serve as mayor pro tem
  • Mark Caldwell on Dodson also wants to serve as mayor pro tem
  • Matt Bailey on Dodson also wants to serve as mayor pro tem
  • Tracy Powers on Planning Commission to consider Main Street apartments, plan revisions
  • johnhuotari on Four incumbents re-elected to Oak Ridge City Council
  • Levi D. Smith on Four incumbents re-elected to Oak Ridge City Council
  • samuel hopwood on Housing: Apartments proposed on former AMSE site
  • Matt Bailey on Robin Smith named Oak Ridge police chief

Search Oak Ridge Today

About Us

About Oak Ridge Today
What We Cover

How To

Advertise
Subscribe

Contact Us

Contact Oak Ridge Today

Copyright © 2021 Oak Ridge Today