• About
    • About Us
    • What We Cover
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Our Advertisers
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Send News
  • Subscribe

Oak Ridge Today

  • Home
  • Sign in
  • News
    • Business
    • Community
    • Education
    • Government
    • Health
    • Police and Fire
    • U.S. Department of Energy
    • Weather
  • Sports
    • High School
    • Middle School
    • Recreation
    • Rowing
    • Youth
  • Entertainment
    • Arts
    • Dancing
    • Movies
    • Music
    • Television
    • Theater
  • Premium Content
  • Obituaries
  • Classifieds

 

Judge recommends against dismissing Y-12 protester charges, says weapons work not a war crime

Posted at 3:22 pm January 3, 2013
By John Huotari 1 Comment

Transform Now Plowshares

The three anti-nuclear weapons activists pictured above allegedly cut through fences and vandalized a high-security building at the Y-12 National Security Complex in July and now face federal charges of property destruction, property depredation, and injuring national defense premises. From left to right the three are Michael R. Walli, Megan Rice, and Greg Boertje-Obed. (Submitted photo)

The charges against three protesters accused of breaking into the Y-12 National Security in July should not be dismissed, a federal judge recommended Wednesday.

U.S. Magistrate Judge C. Clifford Shirley Jr. said the three anti-nuclear weapons activists—Greg Boertje-Obed, Megan Rice, and Michael Walli—have argued that the charges must be dismissed because the production, processing, and storage of nuclear weapons at Y-12 is illegal under United States and international law.

The defendants also contend that the production and continuing threat of the use of nuclear weapons is a war crime and violates international law, Shirley said in a 20-page report and recommendation filed in U.S. District Court in Knoxville on Wednesday.

“The defendants assert that their nonviolent actions to expose and disarm symbolically nuclear weapons were legal, reasonable, and justified,” Shirley said. “Thus, they conclude that laws designed to protect property, such as the statutes charges in the instant case, cannot be applied in such a way that they abrogate the federal and international laws of war.”

But after a 16-page analysis, Shirley said the court has already found that the “justification-type defenses” advanced by the defendants are not a basis for dismissing a December indictment that includes the three most recent charges against them. In addition, the defendants lack standing to challenge United States policy on nuclear weapons, particularly in a criminal case, and the production, processing, and storage of nuclear weapons at Y-12 does not constitute a war crime, Shirley said. And the production, processing, and storage of nuclear weapons does not violate international law, the judge said.

The trio is accused of cutting through fences at Y-12 before dawn on July 28, evading guards in the high-security Protected Area—where deadly force is authorized—and splashing human blood and spray-painting slogans on the Highly Enriched Uranium Materials Facility, where bomb-grade uranium is stored.

Boertje-Obed, Rice, and Walli have been charged with property destruction, property depredation, and injuring national defense premises. They face jail sentences of up to 35 years and fines of up to $750,000.

A trial has been scheduled before U.S. District Judge Thomas W. Phillips in U.S. District Court in Knoxville on May 7.

More information could be added later.

Filed Under: Top Stories, Y-12 National Security Complex, Y-12 Security Breach Tagged With: C. Clifford Shirley, Greg Boertje-Obed, Megan Rice, Michael Walli, U.S. District Court, Y-12 National Security Complex

Advertisements

 


Join the club!

If you appreciate our work, please consider subscribing. Besides helping us, your subscription will give you access to our premium content.

Some of our stories are free, brought to you by Oak Ridge Today with help from our members—advertisers, subscribers, and sponsors.

But some are premium content, available only to members. Those are in-depth, investigative, or exclusive stories that are available only on Oak Ridge Today. They generally require significant time to report, write, and publish.

You can subscribe for as little as $5 per month.

You can read more about your options here.

We currently offer five primary subscription options to readers, and they include benefits.

Basic

  • Basic monthly subscription ($5 per month)—access premium content
  • Basic annual subscription ($60 per year)—access premium content

Pro

  • Pro monthly subscription ($10 per month)—access premium content, get breaking news emails first, and submit one press release or public service announcement per month
  • Pro annual subscription ($100 per year)—save $20 per year, access premium content, get breaking news emails first, and submit one press release or public service announcement per month

Temporary

  • Temporary access ($3 per week for two weeks)

We also have advanced subscription options. You can see them here.

We also accept donations. You can donate here.

If you prefer to send a check for a subscription or donation, you may do so by mailing one to:

Oak Ridge Today
P.O. Box 6064
Oak Ridge, TN 37831

Thank you for your consideration and for reading Oak Ridge Today. We appreciate your support.

Commenting Guidelines

We welcome comments, but we ask you to follow a few guidelines:

1) Please use your real name, including last name. Please also use a valid e-mail address.
2) Be civil. Don't insult others, attack their character, or get personal.
3) Stick to the issues.
4) No profanity.
5) Keep your comments to a reasonable length and to a reasonable number per article.

We reserve the right to remove any comments that violate these guidelines. Comments held for review, usually from those posting for the first time, may not post if they violate these guidelines. Thank you for your patience and understanding. Thank you also for reading Oak Ridge Today and for participating in the discussion.

More information is available here.

Comments

  1. Kay Williamson says

    January 3, 2013 at 6:55 pm

    dismiss the charges, there are harsher criminals out there that need to be locked up instead of these 3 old people…

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Outdoor pool to re-open Friday
  • Children’s Museum to celebrate 50 years with free admission
  • Flatwater Tales Storytelling Festival returning to Oak Ridge
  • City brush pickup continues
  • ORAU employees donate more than 300 pounds of toys and household items to Holiday Bureau
  • Oak Ridge hosting three regattas this month
  • Learn about alternatives to death penalty
  • Guided paddle trip on Melton Hill Lake on Sunday
  • Guided wildflower hike at Haw Ridge on Saturday
  • Ernie’s Creek cleanup is Saturday

Search Oak Ridge Today

About Us

About Oak Ridge Today
What We Cover

How To

Advertise
Subscribe

Contact Us

Contact Oak Ridge Today

Copyright © 2023 Oak Ridge Today