The budget deal that Congress approved earlier this month to reopen the government and raise the debt ceiling kept in place automatic budget cuts known as sequestration.
But those across-the-board cuts are causing concern in the scientific community, including at Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
In August, ORNL Director Thom Mason said the lab had been, up to that point, mostly immune from the cuts because of steps that UT-Battelle, the managing and operating contractor, had already taken to cut costs, including through workforce restructuring, reduced staff and overhead budgets, and benefit changes.
“We’ve just been doing everything we can to prepare for lean budgets,†Mason said.
But there was concern about the long-term impact of the cuts if they are extended, Mason said. One effect: The cuts could prevent the start-up of new research programs. Mason said the long-term impacts might not be felt for two to 20 years.
“The big impact is going forward,†he said. “Research science is all about new programs.â€
In an interview posted by NPR on Monday, Mason expressed concern that the ability to replace ORNL’s Titan supercomputer, a machine that had been the fastest in the world one year ago but has since slipped to No. 2 behind a Chinese system, is moving further and further into the future. Researchers had hoped to replace Titan in 2017.
“The issue is not so much who’s No. 1 in the horse race,” Mason told NPR. “But we think it’s important for the U.S. to always be amongst that group that is pushing the envelope.”
In March, Mason was one of three national lab directors who wrote in Atlantic magazine that research cuts, possibly totaling tens of millions of dollars at U.S. Department of Energy laboratories, would be devastating, both for science and for the many U.S. industries that use lab resources to help power their research and development.
Canceling all new programs and research initiatives, possibly for at least two years, “will freeze American science in place while the rest of the world races forward, and it will knock a generation of young scientists off their stride, ultimately costing billions in missed future opportunities,†said the directors, who also included Paul Alivisatos, director of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, and Eric D. Isaacs, director of Argonne National Laboratory.
The directors said less than one percent of the federal budget goes to fund basic science research. By slashing that spending even further, the government “will achieve short-term savings in millions this year, but the resulting gaps in the innovation pipeline could cost billions of dollars and hurt the national economy for decades to come,” the directors wrote.
Passed as part of the Budget Control Act of 2011, the automatic budget cuts were never expected to happen. Instead, Republicans and Democrats were supposed to reach a deal to reduce the deficit. But they didn’t, and the cuts started going into effect this spring.
Federal legislators of both parties have decried the across-the-board nature of the cuts, but they’ve been unable to make changes. There was some discussion of revising them during the recent showdown over the federal government shutdown, but they were left in place.
At ORNL, Mason reported in August that the lab’s funding was down about $100 million in Fiscal Year 2013, a budget cut of about 7 percent.
Then, in September, he told employees there could be another $100 million drop in funding in Fiscal Year 2014, so ORNL was implementing plans to further reduce overhead spending and opening a voluntary separation program that could reduce the workforce by up to 475 jobs. Those employees who are accepted will leave the payroll by Dec. 31.
Lab officials emphasized that they hope the number of staff cuts is smaller than 475. ORNL has about 4,400 to 4,500 employees.
The short-term deal approved by Congress earlier this month keeps the government open through Jan. 15 and raises the federal government’s debt ceiling through Feb. 7. That means legislators could resume their fiscal feud in less than three months.
Meanwhile, the fiscal 2014 sequestration cuts are expected to kick in by Jan. 15.
TJ Garland says
Ask NSA for more money for their Titan decryption computer.
Anyone like to comment on a webpage about DOE?
Doewatch.com Who is Jim Phelps?
John?
johnhuotari says
I am not familiar with Jim Phelps. I’ll try to take a look when I can.
I continue to be skeptical that Titan would be involved in any NSA activities. Anyone can apply to use it under the U.S. Department of Energy’s Innovative and Novel Computational Impact on Theory and Experiment program, or INCITE (although proposals are peer-reviewed). Also, ORNL has let the media tour the room it’s housed in, peer inside its cabinets, and take pictures. I suspect that wouldn’t be allowed with an NSA-affiliated computer.
TJ Garland says
Your investigative powers are greater than mine. Talk to Wired Magazine. Get a real scoop.
Hide in plain sight–
johnhuotari says
TJ, I’ll see what I can find out.
Cindy McCullough says
Can you link this wired article you reference? I can’t find one by googling, but I am not the best googler around. I do have doubts about Titan being used by the NSA, since they have many of their own supercomputers, I am sure.
johnhuotari says
Cindy, here’s the Wired article by James Bamford from March 2012: http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/03/ff_nsadatacenter/all/
Cindy McCullough says
Read that before, but it says nothing about NSA using Titan. They have their own building at the lab and probably their own supercomputer and I wonder how it compares to Titan, as the tours that include Titan, when it was the fastest still, say “Fastest non-classified computer…”
Terry Copeland Pfeiffer says
Are you serious Mr. Garland? You cite this Mr. Phelps as your expert in these matters? Don’t you have any other credible sources?
TJ Garland says
I did not cite Phelps as my source for the Titan computer. That source is Wired magazine. Learn to comprehend.
I am new here. Is Phelps for real?
Is DOE watch a credible whistleblower site?
Would you comment on some of his stories?
I have seriously studing chemtrails for 15 years. I have sampled the fallout from them.
Have you noticed how clear the sky is since we have not been sprayed nearly the whole month of October?
Cindy McCullough says
The Phelps website sure looks bogus at a quick glance.
David Allred says
Cutting research funding is like buying less seed for next year’s garden because you didn’t have enough vegetables to sell at market this season. It’s the exact opposite solution to the nation’s budgetary woes. Every dollar spent on research typically translates into a market profit of three dollars earned as fresh development and new knowledge lead to productivity increases and new technologies — all of which get dumped back into the economy. It’s literally the dumbest thing our politicians can do at the moment. But then again, we have elected some of the dumbest minds imaginable to lead us…