• About
    • About Us
    • What We Cover
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Our Advertisers
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Send News

Oak Ridge Today

  • Home
  • Sign in
  • News
    • Business
    • Community
    • Education
    • Government
    • Health
    • Police and Fire
    • U.S. Department of Energy
    • Weather
  • Sports
    • High School
    • Middle School
    • Recreation
    • Rowing
    • Youth
  • Entertainment
    • Arts
    • Dancing
    • Movies
    • Music
    • Television
    • Theater
  • Premium Content
  • Obituaries
  • Classifieds

B&W says it’s pleased with federal decision on Y-12, Pantex contract protests

Posted at 4:50 pm April 29, 2013
By John Huotari Leave a Comment

Y-12 National Security Complex

The Babcock and Wilcox Co., the lead management and operating contractor at the Y-12 National Security Complex, said it was pleased with a federal decision Monday upholding protests of a five-year consolidated contract to manage Y-12 and the Pantex Plant near Amarillo, Texas.

One of the two teams that lost a bid to manage two nuclear weapons facilities in Tennessee and Texas said it was pleased by a federal decision announced Monday that upheld protests of the five-year contract, which was awarded in January.

The decision by the U.S. Government Accountability Office also recommended that the procurement be re-opened.

The contract is reported to have a total value of $22 billion, and it was awarded to Consolidated Nuclear Security LLC, or CNS, a team that includes Bechtel National Inc. and Lockheed Martin Services Inc.

But a team that includes Babcock and Wilcox Co. filed a protest. So did a team that includes Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. and Fluor Federal Services Inc.

On Monday, B&W said its team—which also includes URS, Northrop Grumman, and Honeywell—believes its proposal was a “very strong choice for moving closer to the National Nuclear Security Administration’s vision of a consolidated nuclear security enterprise and for continuing the tradition of excellence B&W has maintained at both Y-12 and Pantex over the past 12 years.”

The team is known as Nuclear Production Partners LLC.

“B&W and our Nuclear Production Partners team believe the GAO’s decision supports our concerns about the initial award of this contract,” said E. James Ferland, B&W president and chief executive officer. “While we await a final decision on the path forward from NNSA, B&W remains focused on operating both sites safely and securely.”

B&W has been the lead management and operating contractor at Y-12 and Pantex, and the company said it has made “significant improvements in the operations and infrastructures at both locations since 2001, including meeting or exceeding production goals and modernizing the infrastructure.”

The company then went on to list some of its accomplishments.

More information will be added as it becomes available.

Filed Under: Anderson County, Business, Federal, Government, National Nuclear Security Administration, Oak Ridge, Roane County, Top Stories, Y-12 National Security Complex Tagged With: Babcock and Wilcox Co., Bechtel National Inc., CNS, Consolidated Nuclear Security LLC, contract protests, Fluor Federal Services Inc., Jacobs Engineering Group Inc., Lockheed Martin Services Inc., U.S. Government Accountability Office

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Anderson County Chamber Headquarters Dedication Set for October 17
  • ORISE announces winners of 2025 Future of Science Awards
  • SL Tennessee Supports New Anderson County Chamber Headquarters
  • ORAU 2025 Pollard Scholarship recipients announced
  • Democratic Womens Club Hosts State Rep. Sam McKenzie
  • Flatwater Tales Storytelling Festival Announces 2025 Storytellers
  • Laser-Engraved Bricks Will Line Walkway of New Chamber Headquarters
  • Democratic Womens Club to Discuss Climate Change, Energy and Policy
  • Estate Jewelry Show at Karens Jewelers Features Celebrity Jewelry
  • Keri Cagle named new ORAU senior vice president and ORISE director

Search Oak Ridge Today

Copyright © 2025 Oak Ridge Today