• About
    • About Us
    • What We Cover
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Our Advertisers
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Send News

Oak Ridge Today

  • Home
  • Sign in
  • News
    • Business
    • Community
    • Education
    • Government
    • Health
    • Police and Fire
    • U.S. Department of Energy
    • Weather
  • Sports
    • High School
    • Middle School
    • Recreation
    • Rowing
    • Youth
  • Entertainment
    • Arts
    • Dancing
    • Movies
    • Music
    • Television
    • Theater
  • Premium Content
  • Obituaries
  • Classifieds

Y-12 security breach ‘obvious dereliction of duty’

Posted at 6:14 pm September 13, 2012
By John Huotari 3 Comments

Lawmakers criticized federal officials and contractors during congressional hearings this week on the July 28 security breach at the Y-12 National Security Complex, demanding to know who had been fired and who had been responsible for repairing critical cameras that didn’t work.

“This level of intrusion into the perimeter of a highly secure nuclear weapons facility is unprecedented—and it is completely unacceptable,” said Mike Turner, an Ohio Republican who chairs the U.S. House Strategic Forces Subcommittee. “It is outrageous to think that the greatest threat to the American public from weapons of mass destruction may be the incompetence of Department of Energy security.”

Legislators took aim at federal officials and the “mind-boggling incompetence” of contractors. They wanted to know how an 82-year-old nun was able to reach the “Fort Knox” of uranium, a building inside a high-security area at Y-12 surrounded by fences and protected by alarms and cameras—and where deadly force is authorized.

They learned that one security camera had worked, but it might have been turned off. They were told another device hadn’t worked for at least six months.

“We have an obvious dereliction of duty,” said Rep. Cliff Stearns, a Florida Republican and chair of the House Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee.

They also learned that there had been many false alarms at Y-12 due to animals, and that might have “numbed” guards.

The two House subcommittees had hearings on Wednesday and Thursday, and both featured DOE Deputy Secretary Daniel B. Poneman as a witness.

Wednesday’s hearing also featured DOE Inspector General Gregory H. Friedman, who signed a critical August report that documented a range of failures during the July 28 intrusion, including “troubling displays of ineptitude in responding to alarms,” failures to maintain critical security equipment, misunderstanding of security protocols, and poor communications.

He told the House Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee that it was widely known that the Y-12 security cameras weren’t working. Contractors had the primary responsibility for maintaining them, Friedman said.

“The reaction to that was much too passive, much too lethargic,” he said.

National Nuclear Security Administration Administrator Thomas D’Agostino said camera maintenance had not been prioritized, and federal oversight should have caught that.

Lawmakers called for strong federal oversight of national nuclear facilities. They suggested DOE and the NNSA, a separate DOE agency that oversees Y-12, need to do more to hold people accountable. Several asked who has been fired.

“I’m seeing a lot of bureaucratic finger-pointing between NNSA, DOE, and the two contractors at Y-12,” Turner said. “As far as I can tell, the only individual that has been fired is the Y-12 protective officer who initially—if belatedly and incompetently—responded to the alarms. And he may get rehired thanks to his union’s protest.”

Poneman said he and Energy Secretary Steven Chu are spending hours and hours trying to swiftly find and fix security problems.

“There is no greater sense of urgency that we face anywhere in the complex,” Poneman said. “We are vigorously doing everything we can.”

Federal officials continued to acknowledge that the security breach was unacceptable.

“It’s inexcusable. It’s appalling,” D’Agostino said. “We’ve taken unprecedented steps to address this problem.”

Poneman cited many of the changes made since July 28, ranging from staff retirements and reassignments to repairing cameras and increasing guard patrols. The NNSA issued an Aug. 10 show cause notice to B&W Y-12, giving it 30 days to explain why its contract should not be terminated.

“Lapses in security will not be tolerated,” Poneman said. “We will leave no stone unturned to find out what went wrong.”

Several lawmakers said the nation is lucky that the three anti-nuclear weapons activists who sneaked into Y-12 before dawn on July 28 were peaceful protesters. They allegedly cut through three fences, spray-painted slogans, and splashed human blood on the Highly Enriched Uranium Materials Facility, where bomb-grade uranium is stored.

Several recognized Megan Rice, the most notorious of the protesters because she is an 82-year-old nun.

“If she had been a terrorist, the Lord only knows what could have happened,” said Rep. Joe Barton, a Texas Republican.

“We want to thank you for pointing out some of the problems in our security,” Barton told Rice.

See previous stories on this week’s hearings here and here.

Filed Under: U.S. Department of Energy, Y-12 Security Breach Tagged With: Cliff Stearns, Daniel B. Poneman, DOE Inspector General, Gregory H. Friedman, Megan Rice, Mike Turner, National Nuclear Security Administration, security breach, Strategic Forces Subcommittee, Thomas D'Agostino, U.S. Department of Energy, Y-12 National Security Complex

Comments

  1. Peggy Tiner says

    September 14, 2012 at 8:55 pm

    Maybe we should give that bunch a medal and then send them to prison.

    Reply
    • John Huotari says

      September 14, 2012 at 9:35 pm

      They are getting praised for pointing out security flaws even as they face jail time and fines.

      Reply
  2. switchback says

    September 15, 2012 at 1:11 am

    In my opinion this goes back to the start of outsourcing to
    save funds. I believe it started or accelerated with BWXT, This definitely
    proves that outsourcing jobs do not work as well. I remember when Union Carbide
    and Lockheed Martin had control of the guards and all maintenance which were
    under their employment, everything about the job operated more smoothly and efficiently.

    At one time there were numerous guard towers on Bear Creek
    but someone decide they were not needed. All of Bear Creek could be seen from
    these advantage points. I see another problem with the B&W company as their
    intent is and was to cut out all overtime for maintenance workers & slowly
    take away any and all benefits that they can.

    Shame on you B&W.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • ORAU and American Museum of Science and Energy Foundation formalize partnership to advance Manhattan Project 2.0
  • Author and Law Professor Derek W. Black to Speak on Public Education and Democracy
  • Anderson County Chamber Headquarters Dedication Set for October 17
  • ORISE announces winners of 2025 Future of Science Awards
  • SL Tennessee Supports New Anderson County Chamber Headquarters
  • ORAU 2025 Pollard Scholarship recipients announced
  • Democratic Womens Club Hosts State Rep. Sam McKenzie
  • Flatwater Tales Storytelling Festival Announces 2025 Storytellers
  • Laser-Engraved Bricks Will Line Walkway of New Chamber Headquarters
  • Democratic Womens Club to Discuss Climate Change, Energy and Policy

Search Oak Ridge Today

Copyright © 2025 Oak Ridge Today