To the Editor:
It is understandable for editorials, op-eds, letters to the editor, etc., to be emotional and one-sided. It is typically strong feelings that stimulate such a piece to be written. I think it is appropriate, however, for our leadership (paid and unpaid) to use decorum when expressing their views. And I think it reflects poorly on a community when one member of its leadership decides unilaterally what is important or develops a cause based on accusations and uninvestigated claims. It is divisive and undermining to the remainder of the group.
There are always at least two sides to every story. As a leader, it is tempting to authoritatively address only one side of a story and to utilize selective input to make a case. It is also tempting to address it in a renegade fashion and for it to become a cause célèbre. But the risk is that it gives that person in leadership a false sense of power and righteousness.
I think it is fair to say that the majority of people want openness and honesty in our government. Transparency is a good thing. But let’s make sure information is properly investigated and correct so that we get honest information. It is a disservice for leaders to use their powerful role as an opportunity to support their own cause. Transparency is providing true and balanced information, not just the pieces of information that fit one’s agenda.
True servant leadership results in the greater good for all people. Leadership philosophy and practice entails constructive, respectful, and collaborative input. And it also allows for compromise. Tactics to avoid would include intimidation, humiliation, and aggression. The risk of uninvestigated and perhaps biased accusations made publicly is that it leads to gossip and triangulation rather than dealing with the true problems. It causes much unhappiness, anger, resentment, and distrust. Which of course contributes to an inordinate amount of wasted time and energy without any problems being solved. It also lowers morale and causes a war of sorts within our community and leadership. I expect my leaders to coordinate their efforts to address problems appropriately. And to work as true servant leaders.
Rebecca L. Halperin
Oak Ridge
Angi Agle says
Beautifully said, Ms. Halperin!
Sam Hopwood says
Yes, letters to the editor etc can be emotional, one sided and express strong feelings and this letter to the editor is an example of all those things. For my part, I am grateful for those few leaders who are willing to speak out when they see something that needs attention and are willing to stand up to the “herd” mentality when the “don’t rock the boat” view is taken by some. All views are required to resolve difficult situations. Just my view.
Matt Bailey says
Sam, I don’t think there’s a single person who debates the belief that many things in all communities need attention. Following the established guidelines that are already in place would be a nice start to the process. Working with others would be a refreshing change. It’s all in how you do it.
I am unaware of a single instance where running to the media before a question has been discussed with the other council members has led to a resolution. And certainly not in a positive manner. Wouldn’t it be nice to see OR get some positive publicity for a change? Aren’t you tired of all the drama?
Sam Hopwood says
Well Matt, where drama is concerned perhaps you, Mark and Joe could look in the mirror. The comments that you folks have made in the media have not been in a positive mode for our fair city by any means. Stopping the personal vendetta could be a nice start. What is the old cliche’.. physician heal thyself?? Just sayin’
Joseph Lee says
Say Sam, it’s called fighting fire with fire. We did not start this fight but I can assure you we will be there at the end regardless of how it plays out. The negatively motivated individuals that can not bring themselves to say ANYTHING positive about our city have had their get out of telling a lie for free card stamped as void. Their preoccupation with the past is unfortunate. We are focus on moving this city forward. With one destructive episode after another provided by Ms.Baughn it has become clear she has her own agenda and support for her is in decline. What are you smoking? Get ready, the future will be here in a minute. Thank you.
Mark Caldwell says
Let’s see how you live by your own philosophy Sam. Your comments, at least for me, have not been positive. Problems, problems, problems seems to be your mantra – not solutions.
Regarding personal vendettas, Ms. Baughn and her supporters ( i.e., Mr. Chinn, et al) seem to have plenty.
P.S. Thank you Ms. Halperin for your letter.
Matt Bailey says
Hi Sam. Let me assure you I get NO pleasure out of any of this. But as I told Trina in a string of emails that were copied to all of the city council last week, when Trina quits telling whoppers, quits making wild accusations that have been proven time and time again to be false, I’ll shut up. When she starts working “with council” instead of trying to grab headlines, I’ll shut up. But as long as she hides facts, hides information, and tries to “snooker” the citizens of Oak Ridge, I ain’t letting up! How’s that? Is that fair enough?